There’s been much discussion on the blog recently about distressed properties (bank owned, short sales, court sales, etc).   Currently, these types of listings account for over 40% of the properties listed on our MLS and 50% of the sales in the last thirty days.

I recently overheard a couple agents commenting about the high number of short sales in Sparks.  Curious, I decided to query the MLS and break out distressed properties by MLS area to determine if a large variability between MLS areas exists, and if so, by how much.

The table below shows what I found.

MLS Areas Ranked by % of Distressed Listings

MLS #

MLS Area

total listings

"distressed" listings %

non-distressed listings %

180

Sparks

 206

 65.0%

 35.0%

181

Sparks - East

 208

 59.4%

 40.6%

182

Sparks - Suburban

 184

 56.4%

 43.6%

103

North Valleys

 1079

 55.0%

 45.0%

140

Southeast

 133

 53.8%

 46.2%

109

Spanish Springs

 1473

 53.5%

 46.5%

143

South Meadows

 247

 46.6%

 53.4%

121

Northwest Suburban

 184

 45.4%

 54.6%

119

North

 204

 45.3%

 54.7%

141

Donner Springs

 105

 44.8%

 55.2%

123

West Suburban

 16

 37.5%

 62.5%

122

Somersett

 145

 32.4%

 67.6%

120

Northwest

 191

 28.4%

 71.6%

164

Old South Suburban

 66

 21.2%

 78.8%

163

Southwest

 307

 20.7%

 79.3%

142

Hidden Valley

 53

 18.9%

 81.1%

165

South Suburban

 221

 17.6%

 82.4%

160

Old Southwest

 145

 15.9%

 84.1%

161

West Southwest

 122

 11.5%

 88.5%

171

Southwest Suburban

 134

9.0% 

 91.0%

Click here for a map of our MLS areas.

As you can see from the table above, Sparks leads the area with 65% of the listings having some type of special condition to the sale; followed by the North Valleys (55%); Southeast Reno (53.8%) and Spanish Springs (53.5%).

Those areas with the least proportion of distressed properties include: Southwest Suburban (9.0%); West Southwest (11.5%); Old Southwest (15.9%); and South Suburban (17.6%).

Data courtesy of the Northern Nevada Regional MLS (NNRMLS) – August 2008