The latest Washoe County recording stats have just been released by our friends at Ticor Title. September saw:
- Re-fis continue to fall; down 15% from August’s number
- New homes sales up nearly 13% over August’s new home sales
- Resales also increased nearly 13% over August’s number
Washoe County resales hit 719 units in September. Though not shown on the graph, I had to go back to the bubble years to find the last time a month had at least that many resales. It was way back in June 2006, when 759 resales were recorded in the county.
Washoe County Notice of Default filings for September totaled 930; down 12.8% from August’s whopping 1,067.
Click on the charts below to enlarge.












133 comments
I thought this was the time of the year that Sales were supposed to DROP?
Tired,
I believe the data for Sep/Oct/Nov will be skewed with last minute buyers trying to avail themselves of the expiring $8k 1st time homebuyer credit.
I expect a significant dropoff in sales/prices in Dec/Jan due to that expiration. Even if a new/higher credit is introduced, the period will likely be for a year, so there’ll be no sudden rush instigated as those left still qualified to use it will likely have a year to do so. Just my thoughts, fwiw.
719 sales. One-half of which were below $180,000.
20% of which were below $100,000.
Why not the whole story, Guy?
Realtors (and title companies) are now in an interesting situation. Of course they want to hype up the ‘market recovery’, so they put out the news that sales are going gangbusters. Not since the frenzy of the bubble,they say, have sales been so strong. Of course,what they leave out is that most all of the sales are at the bottom end of the market.
Meanwhile, every realtor in town now knows that he/she can do a lot better financially actually selling 7 $100K houses than spending 18 months trying to sell one delusionally overpriced $700K house.
I agree with you Martin, but I would suggest that the $700K house does not have to be delusionally overpriced for it not to sell.
I for one can agree that there are in Reno SOME houses that are really worth $700K. But the problem is that there are darn few buyers in Reno who can afford, really afford, to buy a $700K house. Darn few. My brother sells real estate, and from what I hear from him, mnay realtors now realize that their financial salvation in the coming years will not be found in trying to sell $700K houses. There has been a major shift in the attitude of a lot of realtors. 5 years ago they thought it beneath their reputation to take a listing below $500K. Now, most of them will kill for a sensibly priced listing at $200K.
Does that 719 number include condos? Because if it does, then one-half of those sales were below $166K.
to the bears (of which i often am one):
my home was listed here in san jose , ca 95120
for what my realtor considered slightly under market on friday–open house sat and sun
the activity was immense…..i have 2 offers in
hand and my realtor is calling for all offers
by tuesday…..some doubters are saying i should
have asked for more…..my realtor says if you price it right the buyers will come (i agreed)
luckily, i have fantastic schools around that
distinguish my neighborhood (truly fantastic)
the offers i have are about 10% below peak bubble
price and i am over joyed (just under 7 figures)
and over asking price
my neighbors house has sat there for 3 months over priced
there is some real bite right now…..the dow is
up again (its rally has astounded me) and virtually everyone i know is scratching their
heads wondering if this is a predictor of better
things to come (healthy doubt—even perma bulls
are doubting—-yes i said bulls)
now i have to rent or live in my office until
i finish my jobs and can move up there
we are already rebounding or its a huge head
fake (i’ve heard the 1933 analogy already) and
i don’t know which way we are headed, but for
now ‘happy times are here again’
Uh…. As repeated many times on this blog, the recovery is regional… & Reno is no San Jose.
Where is Bantering Bear? We need his keen insight on this troubling good news. Please somebody piss all over this good news fast before people can get a little less depressed about the local real estate market!
Similar to bob c’s story, I got a call last night from the new buyers of my neighbors property. It just sold for approx. $1.4M. It had been on the market for about two months.
So some sales are happening out there. Granted the wine country isn’t Reno either, but if a RE recovery is going to happen, places like this getting back to normal sooner may become somewhat of an indicator for when Reno stabilizes.
Oh I know, jobs, inventory, average household incomes all will play a part, but in the big picture when more areas start to stabilize, Reno will be shortly behind, even in those 500K homes.
If only because it will be where retirees go after they sell.
“Washoe County Notice of Default filings for September totaled 930″
Oh, yeah, good news indeed- NOT. Are you shills ever embarrassed by your ignorance, Raging Bullshitter? There is no such thing as a housing recovery when house prices are dropping and foreclosures are near records levels. A simple increase in sales at the expense of prices, putting more loanowners underwater is a far cry from good news. But carry on, challenged one, carry on.
bob, you’re quite right - Reno is no San Jose. That’s one of the things I love about this place.
No $500 million city hall that needs a 100K window washer and three people to operate it.
No $3 billion annual budget.
A somewhat civil city council, in that they aren’t manning the battle lines for every council meeting.
I could go on, but you get the point…..
How fitting. Downer is in CA, yet he questioned why I would be commenting about Reno housing prices- a city in which I was raised and visit quite often. Oh, the hypocrisy. This is a pattern I see quite often amongst these types- talking out of both sides of their mouth. I’ve also noticed a propensity for them to post under multiple identities, no doubt in an attempt to distance themselves from their failings. Smarmy.
If you’ll recall last time you accused me of being an ‘outsider’ I pointed out to you that my son attends UNR, I have a deposit in on place in Reno, a business in Carson City, season ticket holder to the Aces, and hope to move one of my businesses to Reno soon.
That’s my story. If that’s hypocrisy, or you have a problem with that don’t read me.
What I did point out that you’ve yet to reveal what skin you had in the game, at least since I’ve begun reading here in mid 2007.Apparently hit a nerve.
But really, it doesn’t interest me anymore. I think readers can figure it out for themselves.
BobC,
Try the 1930 analogy. Check your charts. If it turns out near the same, we’ll be buying in the summer-fall of 2011 at prices nobody right now can comprehend one iota. What you are witnessing is a denial ‘return to normal’ phase that normally occurs after a major attempt to reconcile the false debt based system in 2008. As the ‘return to normal’ phase passes, we will enter the ’shock-dismay’ and then ‘acceptance’ phases.
The much discussed property at 1025 Manor just got reduced in price to $539k. That’s $405/sq. ft. for those who won’t accept the “finished basement” as premium square footage, or $204/sq. ft. for those that will.
I think we can all agree that this property shows that a high degree of denial still exists at the medium to high end of the market, and I expect prices for places like this to crater over the next 6-12 months.
I remember when the agent got on the blog and rabidly defended the pricing. Seems her efforts would have been better placed scrounging up some $150k properties to list. FWIW.
Plain and simple, jobs. With a +13% unemployment the market still has a way to go. I heard on the radio that our market is consider one of the worst and still has another 12% to fall.
Now you can also make a case for the fact the 13% unemployed are for low paying jobs.
Until more companies hire high paying workers we will not see a recovery for a long time.
Tell me what Reed and other politicians have done to attract hi-tech jobs here? That is the difference between San Jose (where I came from) and here.
Downer posted:
“What I did point out that you’ve yet to reveal what skin you had in the game, at least since I’ve begun reading here in mid 2007.”
I’ll tell you why I despise individuals such as you. You blow into Reno with your big money, fake money, credit, whatever, buy a couple of speculative investments, all the while driving up prices well beyond what locals could ever hope of affording, and all of the sudden you’re an expert on the scene because you’ve hemorrhaged a bunch of cash or fake equity. I’ve got news for you- you don’t know jack about Reno, or real estate for that matter, pal. Guys like you are a dime a dozen. You haven’t disclosed ANYTHING about yourself other than the fact you bought at the peak. Big effing deal, Downer. The idea that you’re qualified to discuss real estate on this blog because you’re a fool with money, yet locals who are waiting for something they can rightfully afford are not, is the most ludicrous, narcissistic stance I’ve ever heard of. Not surprising it comes from somebody in “the wine country.” My advice to you is to stay right where you are, because you won’t stink as much as you would around Reno.
This is probably going to require a whole new post, but has anyone seen this news? Definitely the scariest Reno real estate news I’ve seen so far:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Veros-Releases-Quarterly-US-bw-3666689189.html?x=0&.v=1
Thanks for the post Big Reno Fan. Crazy seeing Reno above Las Vegas. Could it be all the homes out in BFE?
Oh please, I detect shades of the “Rich Californian” theory starting to be resurrected again. This was a big favorite of all the bubble deniers back in 2005-2006 as to why the Reno market had no bubble and why prices in Reno would not fall in any appreciable manner. The theory holds that it really does not matter what Reno household incomes are and whether Reno residents can afford to buy houses in Reno, because there will be a never ending supply of equity-drenched Rich Californians coming here to buy up all the houses in Reno. The theory was exposed for the total nonsense that it was as we witnessed the Reno market become one of the worst in the country with the median price falling about 55%. So much for all the Rich Californians coming here and propping up housing values forever.
Now it appears that some are attempting to bring the theory back from the dead with a slight variation…..the Rich Retired Californian. I suppose this variation will be that hordes of equity-drenched Rich Retired Californians will stream into Reno and buy up all the houses for sale, at huge markups from current prices.
The theory was nonsense in 2005-2006, and it is still nonsense today. It didn’t happen then, and it won’t happen now.
someone enlighten me as to BB’s interest in
the reno market? we all have biases or reasons
to be interested (no one does this as a public service) and being a newbie maybe i can understand the hostile dynamics that surround him
i share some of his beliefs or acknowledge their
possibilty, but i can’t understand his personal
angle in this market
thank you
Bob C,
Can you provide the address of the house you sold in San jose? I want to try to see why it is only 10% under bubble prices as I have friends that are trying to sell in San Jose at 30% under bubble prices with still no luck. Thanks!
i’ll give to you after i get the offers and accept
one……that is propritery info until all offers
are in and a back up is put in place (i promised
realtor i would discuss no numbers…you never know)
its the zip code 95120 almaden valley
our public schools are shining bright and
we have no crime…its become a haven for
those that value those 2 items
the rest of san jose has been hurt….because
there are no distinquishing aspects one neighborhood to another
the better the location the better the pricing power……..because there are so few ‘nice’ areas
tell your friend i live in almaden valley (williams, bret hart and leland high) and he
should understand the picture
scroll through lower end 95120 properties and you’ll see what i mean
or just do a trulia neighborhood info and you’ll
see 95120 has widened the price per / sf to
all time high versus other parts of san jose
location location location
Bob C,
You make a very good point, mentioning those top three priorities in real estate. Old Southwest Reno is another example of how location can insulate you against the downturns.
I’d love to live there someday, and continue to be frustrated by the fact that the Old SW continues to have “sticky” prices. Those old houses on leafy streets just haven’t taken the hit that the rest of Reno has. Only downside to this part of town is that the schools (elementary and grade school) aren’t as good as certain other neighborhoods (South Suburban and Caughlin Ranch, for example).
That said, who knows what winter will bring to RE prices throughout Reno? It’ll be interesting to see who’s eating crow come springtime
.
FRH –
I’m not sure what you’re using as your basis for rating the schools the Old SW is zoned for… Jesse Beck and Swope are consistently rated some of the best in the district.
I’m not saying the Old SW hasn’t taken a hit in current RE market, but the leafy streets, unique homes with character and darn good schools are why it continues to weather the storm better than any neighborhood in Reno.
RI - if was me you were referring to, (California Money)I firmly believe that Reno’s salvation will be from retirees. I base this on these assumptions; No income tax. Lower cost for housing. Good climate (IMO).Great people.
I could be wrong. It’s been pointed out earlier today. But WTH, it’s what I believe.
Notice of defaults are down 12.8% over last months, while sales have hit numbers not seen since the boom days?
let me get this straight. what % of NOD’s become foreclosures? I thought I heard someone mention it was roughly 30-40%?
that would equate to roughly 300 foreclosures for the month yet 719 home sales.
If that holds true, then we actually may be eating into the foreclosure inventory finally, right?
I know of one person at my office who bought their house in August under one of their father’s credit while letting their house in Somersett go into foreclosure.
Another got a short sale offer on her own house and turned around and bought a short sale house a few weeks later. Banks are lending.
There appears to be a lot of creative financing still going on around here.
Oh, and let’s not forget the good old Family Trust routine.
nvmojo, I brought that fact up a few months ago. I was looking at a house (short sale) and followed the ownership trail. It lead to another house they purchased, just before defaulting on the one I was looking at.
This might explain where all the people that are getting NOD’s are going, as they are not showing up in the rental market and the population is not changing enough for the number of foreclosures.
I would have thought there was a law against that, but apparently no one seems to care or budget constrains have kept enforcement to a minimum.
Tired,
The % of NOD’s that become foreclosures is a moving target ie. totally random.
Right now in places like Detroit, virtually no NOD’s are converting, as once that happens banks are on the hook for taxes etc. It makes perfect sense. Why be responsible for upkeep when there is virtually no chance of selling? Liens are booked against the owner. I expect this is beginning to happen in Reno as well. Thats why I wouldn’t buy in Reno with a ten foot pole. There are just too many variables. And please don’t kid yourself about inventory. I think if we knew the true figures it would be truely staggering.
I know we call all make predictions and hide behind cyber anonomity.
But I’m willing to bet anyone that todays $1 million asking price in IV, will exchange hands at 500k sometime in the next 4 years.
Any takers?
“IRS probing home-buyer tax credit claims: report”
“(Reuters) – The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is probing more than 100,000 doubtful claims of a tax credit meant for first-time home buyers, the Wall Street Journal reported on its website on Tuesday.”
“Lawmakers have expressed concern that significant number of claims might turn out to be fraudulent, the paper said.
The IRS was investigating 167 “criminal schemes” involving the credit, according to the House Ways and Means oversight subcommittee, the paper said.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091020/ts_nm/us_homebuyercredit
BB-Geez, it took the IRS maybe 10 years to tighten up the loopholes for the Earned Income Tax Credit, so this doesn’t surprise me in the least. The Feds are not all over internal controls, IMO.
Wow,
Reading BB’s angry response to Down But Not Out, sparked a flashback about living in Reno nearly 30 years ago.
This was the early 80’s and at the time, Reno/Sparks was not exactly the Garden of Eden. The best employers in town were Sierra Pacific, Nevada Bell, and a few Banks. The local casinos controlled the politics and labor market.
About 30 of us relocated to Reno to work for a Fortune 500 company. These were first job out of college positions, and our pay was about on par with the locals. It did not take us Reno newbies long to find out that we were less than welcome in town. We discovered it was okay to come and spend our money, but after the money was gone, the message was quite clear - leave and go back where you came from. We coined this attitude the “Casino Mentality”.
Upon reading BB’s comments, I thought, Oh My God, it has been 30 years, can it be possible so little has changed? Are the locals still that angry and resentful, about outsiders? Are people who relocate here welcome only as long as they are spending money? Is the “Casino Mentality” so deeply ingrained, that it can erupt into a Mel Gibson Moment, at any time?
Since BB believes him/herself to be the expert on the locals, I will annoint myself as the expert on outsiders who bring our families, businesses, capital, professional expertise, and employment opportunities to Northern Nevada.
For the record, we brought our business to Reno in 2000. As commercial tenants we have paid over 800K in rent to local landlords. Our staffing has been as high as 15 employees.
A universal and constant complaint of all Northern Nevada employers is the subpar quality of the local labor force. Many local employees have a low commitment to their workplace, a low level of education and training, and a less than positive work attitude.
Did you ever wonder why there are so many warehouses and low paying warehouse jobs? Like many other companies, we eventually figured out the Reno area was best used as a distribution/warehousing center, allocating the higher level jobs to metropolitan areas.
Until the “Casino Mentality” attitude changes, Northern Nevada will always be a second rate economic center. Companies such as Mirosoft licensing and Intuit will use the Reno facilities as 1-2 year training center. The upper management positions and high salaries will be located in Seattle and Tucson.
What does this have to do with local Real Estate? A lot.
The growth of this area was not caused by people like BB and his ilk. It was hundreds of outsiders like Down But Not Out, who brought their business, capital and expertise to this area that created the growth and expanded opportunities for everyone. Like most businessmen, they worked their butts off to make it happen.
The casinos and local city hall slobs of the early 80’s, liked things the way they were. They were hardly open to the idea of growth which would result in sharing power and eventually allowing labor arbitrage. The handwriting was on the wall 10 years ago with the advent of Tribal Casinos, can anyone really believe that this cabal had the vision to diversify the regional economy. It was outside businessmen who were the fundamental drivers of change and growth in Northern Nevada.
Perhaps the locals did not get their fair share of the wealth that was created during the 1990’s early 2000’s. So what, who said life was fair? There is a constant bitch about how the area has changed. Too bad, I don’t remember local contractors withdrawing bids because of quality of life issues. Anyone who claims that the Reno of 30 years ago is better than the Reno of Today is suffering from terminal dementia.
It is the outsiders that BB hates so much that are the very ones who made this area prosper. Talk about hypocrisy.
There is a lot of thoughtful and useful information posted to this blog. I appreciate the many insights regarding local and national real estate trends. That being said, there is also a “kick them when they are down attitude” towards developers such as Fernado Leal and homeowners that made unlucky purchasing decisions that I find disturbing.
Okay, his timing was bad. The units were too expensive, perhaps he is/was greedy (not an uncommon human trait)etc. etc.
At least the man tried. He worked hard to bring the project to completion. He raised capital, provided for hundreds of local jobs and he had a vision (more likely an illusion) about a new downtown lifestyle. For crying out loud, give the guy a little credit. Compliments are free.
Many writers post about the local real estate market as if they are a hedge fund manager, buying and selling Real Estate like shares of Apple Computer. For those who derive their income from real estate, it makes sense. For most of us, real estate buy/sell decisions are complicated by many human factors.
- we may have owned a residence for over 10 years, and are mostly indifferent to the housing price change. We sold high and bought high or we sold low and bought low, it is all relative. Apparently, we are all kind of dumb, not like the some of the real estates tycoons that post here.
- we bought houses in good school districts so our children could have a better education. Perhaps we overpaid, or bought a little more house than we can afford. Perhaps, we believe Our children’s education is more important than the absolute value of our real property.
- we retired in Northern Nevada to buy or build our dream house. We sold our 1800 sq foot ranch-style home in a nondescript California suburb and bought a larger home with a spacious kitchen, granite counter tops, and a garage that is large enough to actually hold two cars. Are we happy that our home value has decreased? No. Was it a bad decision to fulfill the lifestyle we want? No.
- we planned on expanding our family size, so we decided to buy a bigger house rather than trade up at a later date. We may have gotten in a little over our heads. Does this make us greedy speculators?
- perhaps we are very successful financially, we want to build a house that displays our wealth.
- job transfer etc.
The plus 500K homes will eventually recover, but like most of the posters I expect some tough times over the next 1-2 years. The dream of the beautiful house, with the view, with the nice yard, in the right school district never ends. It just gets postponed. Those of you who post otherwise and are basing their assumptions on very logical economic fundamentals are simply ignoring the power of the human factor.
BB - it will be all those outsiders you hate so much who will restore equilibrium to the local real estate market.
BTW - no point in posting love it or leave it replies. We have always felt that Reno/Tahoe area is very beautiful and have mostly enjoyed the last 10 years living here. We have made a decision that an uban, multi-cultural experience is as important for our children as secondary school curriculum and plan to return to West LA. Besides, my wife hates the cold and misses the ocean. We will retain some business functions in Sparks, so will still be traveling here on a regular basis and will eventually sell or downsize the 500k plus home. I guess time will tell who is correct about the outlook for these homes.
dirtbagger—
agree or disagree that is a beautiful piece of prose
I agree with bob c on that.
I saw the name dirtbagger and thought for sure Derrick was back. Not so at all.
Now RagingBull = Derrick? I might believe that.
Wow, Dirtbagger. Lots and lots of generalizations and untruths in your post. My post was directed solely at Downer, specifically regarding his perceived criteria for determining who is, and is not, qualified to discuss real estate on this blog, but apparently it hit a little too close to home for you, huh?
You seem to be very opinionated and judgmental when it comes to others. When you say “A universal and constant complaint of all Northern Nevada employers is the subpar quality of the local labor force”, you insult the intelligence of the people of the area. You follow this up with “Many local employees have a low commitment to their workplace, a low level of education and training, and a less than positive work attitude.” Could it be that the reverse is true? That locals are tired of wealthy, greedy outsiders (Dirtbaggers) showing up and providing low paying, low skill jobs all the while expecting cheery attitudes and a high level of productivity for which their compensation is not commensurate?
Most northern Nevadans welcome newcomers. If you ask transplants, they’ll mostly tell you that the people in Reno are friendly. If you felt less than welcome in Reno, then you’d really have a rude awakening in most other states. I, personally, have nothing against transplants. I am one, in another state!
“Did you ever wonder why there are so many warehouses and low paying warehouse jobs?”
No, I never have. It’s quite clear that it’s cheaper to conduct such business here than in CA. It’s a no-brainer. The reason Reno has a low skill workforce is because of parasites like yourself, evidenced by your comment:
“Like many other companies, we eventually figured out the Reno area was best used as a distribution/warehousing center, allocating the higher level jobs to metropolitan areas.”
You then go on to lie:
“It is the outsiders that BB hates so much that are the very ones who made this area prosper. Talk about hypocrisy.”
I never said I hate outsiders. You made a false assumption.
Another gem:
“The growth of this area was not caused by people like BB and his ilk. It was hundreds of outsiders like Down But Not Out, who brought their business, capital and expertise to this area that created the growth and expanded opportunities for everyone. Like most businessmen, they worked their butts off to make it happen.”
This is pure horsesh!t. A lot of this “growth” you speak of was completely unhealthy, and had to do with large corporate builders and big box retailers moving into the area and exploiting the cheap land, etc. When the tide turned, they left the area holding the bag. This was NOT a net gain. It was quite unhealthy. You even go on to say:
“Perhaps the locals did not get their fair share of the wealth that was created during the 1990’s early 2000’s. So what, who said life was fair? There is a constant bitch about how the area has changed. Too bad, I don’t remember local contractors withdrawing bids because of quality of life issues. Anyone who claims that the Reno of 30 years ago is better than the Reno of Today is suffering from terminal dementia.”
You are clearly of the “I got mine” variety, and need to go back to “West” LA so you can be surrounded by the same sort of rot. A large portion of the sustainable small businesses in the area were created and are run by locals. Several of whom are personal friends. They care about the community, and have an interest in what’s fair and equitable.
“BB - it will be all those outsiders you hate so much who will restore equilibrium to the local real estate market.”
No, it won’t. It will be the aforementioned locals with roots and an interest in the sustainable future of the area, not phonies from SoCal who can only eek out a living in bubble times, but disappear like an empty suit when the going gets tough, rather than putting in the hard work required to get through. Good riddance to you, Dirtbagger.
Downer,
I ain’t no Derrick.
I also don’t have a crystal ball, nor does anyone else on this blog. What tickles me most are those with a sense of absolute certainty and conviction in their assertions. That type of hubris is a sure recipe for eventual disaster, regardless of the topic in question.
We can argue ad nauseam as to whether there is deflation, inflation, boom, bust, good deals, or sucker’s bets. Here’s some secular issues that you cannot argue against:
1) Dollars are being printed into oblivion, meaning eventually it’ll take alot more dollars to buy everything, including real estate.
2) The world keeps populating itself into oblivion. More people equals more demand for housing.
3) New home building is at a standstill. Eventually, the supply will run out.
Now, there is an awful lot of supply out there right now due to REOs. But do not subject yourself to the fallacy of pessimism. It is always darkest before the dawn. That supply is starting to get sopped up. Just look at Guy’s stats.
Bottom line: If you’ve found a place that you like and can afford, it’s a hell of alot less risky to buy today than it has been any time in the last 9 years. If you’d rather wait and see what happens and rent for a while, that’s ok too!
My sincere apologies for the suggestion. I forgot what I realized before, you write too well to be ‘Derrick’.
Dirtbag,
One of your soundbites gave me a belly laugh:
“We have made a decision that an uban, multi-cultural experience is as important for our children as secondary school curriculum and plan to return to West LA.”
West LA? Multicultural? Is that Bel Air, Beverly Hills, or Santa Monica? Yeah, lot’s of crips and bloods in those barrios with which to ejumacate the kiddies.
Can anyone out there argue against me that California is the most completely FUBAR state in the nation? $30B deficits, taxes going through the roof, an inability to govern, horrible schools…
Unless you got the kiddies in a private school in 90210, but, then, oh yeah, what about the multi-cultural stuff??? Not many new immigrants there in those schools….
Dude, any credibility you had got blown out with your upcoming move back to the land of milk and honey — West LA. Oh yeah, lot’s of friendly people there, too……not! As BB might say, BWAHHHAAAAHHHAAA. You can have it. Bye Bye.
Can’t wait to buy that REO you’re walking away from.
Dirtbag, I’m sorry but my curiosity has the best of me.
It sounds like you are disappointed that there are no highly skilled high tech workers waiting in the trees for jobs here.
Why should they be here, when all the work is in the Bay Area. There was an article a few years back in Silicon Valley that said college grads have to hit the job running, as they are already behind the curve because of the leading edge tech.
High tech has to keep pace or die. Until there are companies located here, high tech workers will go where they can get high tech jobs.
I wouldn’t expect to find farms in Berkeley anymore than I would expect to find skyscrapers in Modesto.
So if you came here with this intention, it sounds to me like you didn’t do your homework first.
BUYING NOW VS WAITING??
There’s absolutely no rocket science here! If interest rates were not temporally/artificially low the housing market would be completely wiped out? And prices would have been well on there way to correcting them-selfs to realistic affordable levels, {Keeping home prices artificially inflated is not the economy’s cure…Its the poison}}
OH SURE.. The Realtors making a case for buying now vs renting “Buying is cheaper” bla bla bla
Thats great until down the road after the euphoria of having a new home wears off {and your Realtors long gone, Counting there commissions} and you realize that your home is now worth $40,000 less than you paid, And now you find yourself trapped, No refinancing, No upgrading, No relocating, Just stuck carrying all the benefits of negative equity hoping for some kind of miracle from Uncle-Sam..
Most of the current buyers will agree with you? The market does have incredible evidence to continue to fall, But there in it for the long haul and don’t care about price just the payment?
{Mimicking there Realtors sales pitch}… Is that about the stupidest thing you’ve ever heard??
These are the same kind of people that were duped into buying 04-05 and 06
I SUBMIT THIS: Wait be patient? Keep your-self mobile, Rent a little longer, See how this very volatile market plays out? So you piss off a little more rent money BIG DEAL! Better than being stuck with negative equity carrying the payment,lost taxes etc etc. For who knows how long?….
One thing looks to be certain… There’s going to be plenty of inventory to choose from?….
E.Edward,
While I don’t disagree with much of the substance of your post, by your grammar, spelling, and syntax I’ll hazard a guess that you are a………teacher??
Just wunderin’…
Is this blog being taken over by crazies who can’t even remember what they said three days ago?
“What tickles me most are those with a sense of absolute certainity and conviction in their assertions. That type of hubris is a sure recipe for eventual disaster, regardless of the topic in question.”
Raging Bull,
October 20, 2009, at 3:41 pm.
“Bears, your moronic mantra has grown tiring. Don’t fall victim to not being nimble enough to change your attitude with a changing environment. I call the bottom. And it is NOW”.
Raging Bull,
October 17, 2009, at 11:10 pm
Absolute certainty? hubris?
jezzus, dude, any modicum of credibility requires that you can go more than 72 hours without making yourself look like a fool.
Great call, Raymond. I noticed the same absolute contradiction from Raging Bull. He blows onto the blog claiming the “bottom is NOW” with the exact hubris and “absolute certainty” he says 3 days later is a recipe for disaster.
Ah yes, the multi-culturalism of L.A. How I miss the used diapers littering the sidewalks.
Ironic that the criticism is against a guy that relocated, brought jobs here and actually contributed to Reno’s economy. Are you really ready to defend Reno vs. West LA? Haven’t the statistics that have been shown the last few days made anyone realize this will always be the last place in the Country to recover from the recession/ depression unless you change your attitude????
willk, your probably of the same group that puts down the downtown pointing out all the homeless and urine infested walls.
Raymond, nice to pick out comments made on a blog over a few days to show discrepancies -that can be proved about most everyone.Write more, then it’ll be our turn.
As Sully suggests, I may do a lot more research as to the labor pool before I relocate to Reno.
this blog is my favorite reading
and dirt-bagger i took my son at age 11 or 12
to watts (during day) to play some street ball
and it was one of his most memorable days–we
had a blast
Raymond and Martin,
Touche’. I’ll give you two students a “satisfactory” for paying attention.
Yeah, I did use a bit of flair and gusto, but I had just gotten done reading all of the Bear’s recent pontifications and I was feeling pretty jazzed up and poetic.
FWIW, I don’t mind BB and his contributions as he’s kinda transcended the whole blog and stands as a Greek chorus for all the dour pessimists out there. It’s his mindless imitators and other lemmings that can really crease me from time to time — the ones with the mixed up grammar and severe lack of any original thought.
All that stated, don’t you pessimists get tired of the dour predictions of the end of the world?
So, I thought I’d spice up this blog a bit and represent the other side of the argument. Since I posted that charming contribution of mine that you so glowingly referred to, I believe a bit of balance has been restored. Think of me as kind of a Jedi Warrior for Reno Real Estate ;). To varying degrees Tired of Waiting, Smarten, Bob C, Johnny, and Karla have contributed with something outside of the standard doomsday mantra that is more typical here. So, mission accomplished. May the Force be with you.
Thus, to make myself perfectly clear I believe there are deals out there. I refute the Chicken Littles out there. I also believe you can still get ripped off, especially at the higher end. And, I could be completely wrong. I don’t have the answers, nor does anyone else, no matter how charming or irate their posts are. As CL would say, ’nuff said.
If banks are holding back converting NODs then maybe we are in for an L shaped recovery (if we are at the bottom). Banks trickling out houses will balance out the shortage of new builds.
After reading Dirtbagger’s post, I have difficulty understanding how he reaches his conclusions about BB or Reno. Probably some connection between BB being correct about the housing crash and the fact that he “some how” holds BB responsible for it. I mean, Reno is a warehousing/distribution center because its taxes are lower than California. Has nothing to do about the local labor pool.
As for the “casino mentality”, welcome to Nevada. The movie “The Misfits” tells you everything you need to know.
As for moving to West LA, yeah, I think Dirtbagger will fit in better there and is a good move on his part.
Sully -
You are correct. I made some misjudgements about moving and running a light manufacturing business in Northern Nevada. I under estimated the value of an having an established manufacturing infrastracture(as in So Cal). Relatively simple tasks like finding a local replacement for injection manufacturing was nearly impossible. Locating competitive sources of custom packaging was difficult. I had to teach myself about PLC’s and ladder logic programing because there were no techicians in the vicinity. The list could go on and on.
We gave up on domestic manufacturing and outsourced production to Toluca Mexico and SE Asia years ago. We simply could no longer compete against the foreign imports. End of story.
I find the posts about Los Angeles amusing. That is the mark of a great city. We can all live in LA and have different life experiences. Most of the people who moved to LA and stayed, started out living in the gritty parts of town. I worked and manufactured in East LA, Vernon, and South Bay. If dirty diapers on the sidewalk is the worst you found, am curious where you lived and worked. How about a dead bum in a downtown alley or a garment district that smells like piss. As time passed (25 years) most of us moved to the better areas.
As for an urban life style, isn’t that exactly what some members of the Reno community are trying to create in the downtown core.
Final point - Opinion only. Our children will need social and work skills that will enable them to live and function in a multi-national world.
My wife and I believe that completing the education of our children in Los Angeles will help give them that exposure.
People move to and from Reno every day for all sorts of reasons. It does not mean they dislike the area or the people that reside here.
MoveToReno- keep under BB’s skirt. It’s safe there and you won’t have to come out until the upturn has started in a few years. I too think Dirtbaggger will enjoy West LA more - just not for the same reasons you’re trying to point out.
As to a suggested solution to the RE problem, why doesn’t Reno try to bring industry to town? There’s no State income tax, cheap land good weather and yet few want to relocate here. What’s left, the workforce? Why isn’t anyone talking about a solution rather than agreeing an employer should go as fast as you can say ‘West LA?
Is anyone that writes in here trying to do something about the fact Reno is dead last from a recovery standpoint? Sorry but I just read my business future in Dirtbaggers experience and I’m going to look closely at not making the same mistake.
As for being a shill; I asked once on this blog whether we could sway RE in Reno. Using the starting point that most people that read RRB are pretty savvy. I got a resounding ‘no way’.
So I’m not sure how anyone can be a shill.Too optimistic, unrealistic, delusional? Sure.
Still not bad attributes to have for life.
Down but not out….don;’t tell me that you are another one of the guys that got caught up in the housing boom.
So you are saying that the upturn is a “few years away”? Looks like I can sleep easy tonight knowing that.
West LA and Reno are worlds apart culturally.
Let’s see, bring industry to town. You mean put the cart back behind the horse! A novel thought.
What could they do with more jobs, expanded workforce more tax money to spend. Naa that’s too much work. Its easier to sit on hinnie and cross fingers. These yoyo’s still have a $20,000 limit that can be outside a trust before probate. At least California has a $100,000 limit.
The whole political system here needs to get into the 21st Century, or Nevada will continue to fall further behind the curve, actually they’re not far from the bottom now.
It will take the entire range of state,county and city working together to bring something of substance here. Casinos can only do so much, mostly in the leisure area.
A mini high tech area would be nice, if supported by the powerhouses from Silicon Valley. Something to deviate away from gaming and warehousing.
Built it and they will come, not get em here and they will watch you build it.
Sorry, heinie not hinnie.
Sully, I’m not that sure Nevadans want a lot of progress. They killed Yucca Mountain and that probably would have generated several $billion a year to Nevada’s tax coffers.
I just want a nice house in a nice neighborhood. Reno has plenty of that. I’m not from Reno, but I’ve visited many times, and my wife grew up there. I really like Reno. I plan to move there with my wife and kids next year.
I don’t need monumental growth, or big companies moving here. In fact, if that started happening, I’d consider it a detractor. Move to any metropolis in the country if that’s what you’re in to.
Get bigger. Get busier. Get more traffic. Get more crime. Get more of everything. No thanks. Reno has all that I want.
I like Reno just fine, and am quite happy if no one else does. If you are happier in California, go for it. I was raised there and don’t want to go back, except to visit. It’s a beautiful state, but the governance of California is a real mess, and taxes are set to skyrocket.
Reno has Lake Tahoe nearby, a good university, good neighborhoods, the Aces, great outdoor recreation.
If you really don’t like Reno, then why are you on this blog? What I get from this blog is a good feel for what is an appropriate price for various houses in various neighborhoods. It’ll ensure I don’t screw myself too hard when I do buy. All this talk about how great California is makes me wonder about the authors, and why they are on this blog.
I like Reno, just fine. Sue me.
Well there’s your demographic. Hope he can procreate.
I like reno, too. But it doesn’t like itself. When I suggested a mini area, I meant mini - not a throbbing high tech center hiring thousands of people.
Something more like a large training center/school that specializes in high tech jobs.
I don’t want the LA or Silicon valley rush hour traffic either.
But depending on casinos for tax revenue isn’t getting the job done. Tribal casinos have taken too much away from them. Hot August nights only goes so far.
How else are we going to fill up all these 400K+ houses. The US Census dept came out with an update last month and shows the median household income in Washoe County (for 2007) at $54,500.
Are you willing to pay 4-5 times more in property taxes, so the county can keep their spending program in place? Or perhaps sitting on your heinie is a better way, seems to be the mind set here anyway.
Another thing, the part about the limit on the trusts. That creates zero problems with traffic!
And I agree with the statement on California governance, that’s the main reason I left. But this is 2009 not 1909.
Median household income for Washoe County is $54,500.
So a $500K house is only 9.175 x income.
What’s the problem?
Sane Economists don’t make monetary bets on the future of the economy - especially on this blog.
So coining lyrics from Cypress Hill Mr. “Insane in the Membrane, is “anyone…willing to bet…that today’s $1 million asking price in IV, will exchange hands at 500k sometime in the next 4 years? Any takers?”
Well again, you need to define your poison [so I will]. And I’m not willing to wait 4 years for you to pay up. So let’s make it 2 years. And given the market, I think I need some odds. So how about it SE?
I’ll give you five examples [take your pick] of the current $1M IV listings I have in mind that WON’T exchange hands for $500K within the next 2 years [meaning you lose]:
MLS #937526 - 886 Rosewood Circle listed at $990K
MLS #938558 - 809 Rosewood Circle listed at $995K
MLS #938557 - 826 Rosewood Circle listed at $995K
MLS #938556 - 832 Rosewood Circle listed at $995K
MLS #938409 - 869 Rosewood Circle listed at an even $1M
Given this is Nevada, I’ll put up $1K; you put up the multiple of this figure; Mike will hold onto the cash [are yhou willing Mike?]; let’s have Mike invest the money in a no load China emerging markets mutual fund; and whoever wins inherits the fund’s position.
When you throw out a bet on this blog [are you listening Derrick?], you put up or leave [and when you leave, don’t come back using one or more aliases].
So are you game SE?
I think you have materially altered the proposition Smarten. I think the whole point of SE is that this market deterioration is going to be a long slow haul, especially in the upper end of the market. You can’t just cut the time period in half. Also, picking 5 houses on the same street and limiting the bet to just those houses seems a bit of cherrypicking, no?
Sure Walter; that’s the point.
Come on, brand new, over priced construction that has been on the market for over a year. Price/square foot approaching $400. Delusional seller in trouble. Construction loans coming due. Mortgage resets on the cusp. If I gave you a similar example in Somersett or Damante Ranch, how would you respond? It’s not like there are a lot of IV properties for sale at $1M. And what are the odds they’re going to resell within the next 2 or 4 years for that matter? At least I selected something we can say will sell [a multiple number of times] within the next 2 years.
And what’s this garbage with 4 years? Let’s make it 10. Or how about 20 [so no one will even remember the bet; let alone collect]? Mr. Econ is willing to bet that after IV real state has dropped 40% or more in value in the last year plus [just listen to the pundits], it’s going to drop another 50%? He doesn’t know what he’s talking about and my “clarification” of his bet makes this abundently clear to anyone who really knows IV real estate.
Hooray for my side!
I am smart and you are stupid.
I am right and you are wrong.
I am wise and you are dumb.
You all have far more in common with each other than you realize!
You are all really great at talking out of your ass.
If most of you were half as smart and half a right as you profess to be here, you’d be so frickin’ rich you’d have no interest in this little blog. You be off on your yacht somewhere.
Such a collection of Masters of the Universe it makes a girl quiver.
Marilee (aka Bantering Bear),
Your so funny. That’s good. You almost had me Bear. I almost can’t keep up with your aliases. Where you been all day?!!
What’s so clever about the post is that you joined right in with that new name (transgender, even), and did the very thing you were accusing us of.
I can’t hardly keep up with you.
Smarten,
Glad to make your acqaintance. What I had in mind was a simple wager between enquiring minds. I’m just a poor economist - I can’t afford $1K- but as I admit to being the instigator, I’ll settle for $100. Ok by you?
Ok some groundrules.
I absolutely have to insist on the time frame as per my above post ie. June 2013. See, although I am only a poor economist, I am privy to good information. The first meaningful uptick in IV ARM funded property begins in Q4 2011. Based on trends involving other high end properties around the country, capitulation usually takes places 18-24 months later. Which leaves us in Q2 2013. Sorry but I have to insist on this.
As you mention there aren’t that many houses that change hands in IV. So I’ll give you this, and make it 2 houses currently priced over $1 mill. will exchange hands for less than $500K.
Now, with regards to the places you list above;
As you can tell, my prediction is based upon the implosion of the resetting ARM (and deflation, but thats another matter). None of the places you list is being funded by an ARM, and only 2 properties are currently holding a mortgage. So as they don’t fit my model, I’m gonna have to pass on those.
So, how about this proposal?
I look forward to your response.
So, Dipsh!t (very appropriate), I mean Derrick, how many different names now, huh? You angry that I saw through your latest “tired of waiting”? No matter what name you post under, you’re completely transparent as you write like a child, and your message is always the same. I would actually not be surprised if you are Marilee as well, though there are too few spelling and syntax errors. Unlike you, I have absolutely zero need, or interest, in posting under different moniker’s.
BTW, I’ve been meaning to mention that since you were foolish enough to use your full name when you first started in with your mindless diarrhea of the mouth a few years ago, I went on the Washoe County assessor’s site to look at the house you used to pretended to own. You don’t own a house in Reno. You’re a fraud. And, after your latest see through posts as “tired of waiting”, it seems that you are, if you’re not still lying (which would be hard to imagine), buying a condo. This, from somebody who has insulted anyone who has ever lived in an attached product. You have ZERO credibility, and are obviously a lost soul in dire need of attention and help. If I hadn’t seen your myspace page (thanks to GreenNV) I’d think you were 13 years old, though perhaps you are of the “slow” variety. Sad, sad, sad…
pretended = pretend.
I wish we could increase the size of the comment box while writing replies. Its small size makes it difficult to review.
Sane are you really an economist? The reason I asked is because economist have a poor track record for calling the start/end of recessions.
I do like your 2nd qtr 2013 date, as it coincides with something I’m working on that is not directly real estate related. I was concerned about the CPI data (because of all the changes made to it) going back to 1929.
Long story short - My charting showed the beginning of a new bull market (stocks) in Oct/2012. This date would be six months ahead of your “bottom” (?). It actually fits in the puzzle.
Sully,
I am an economist, and yes you are correct, most economists have poor records predicting just about anything.
However, I still think it is a good idea to do one’s research when purchasing a “desired liability” such as a house. My wife has this urge to retire in IV, so I have done some scouting around of the local real estate, as I think I’m going to be forced into buying something.
BTW,
Did anyone notice the unemployment stats that came out this morning?
Nevada is sitting at 13.3% - a new record.
Yes, I noticed that a few days ago, Sane Economist, and commented on it. The idea that there will be any stabilization in the Reno housing market in the face of the highest, and still rising, unemployment in the history of the city is seriously deluded.
Move, I’m not sure where I stand on the Yucca Mountain issue, but I am finding a lot of head in the sand mentality here.
I’m not a proponent of uncontrolled growth, there is already enough here to last a couple of decades. But, I really don’t see why we can’t do something to bring in higher wage jobs as replacements for ones that have been lost.
I always thought if I gotta work 8 hours a day, I might as well make some money while I’m doing it.
Maybe everyone here makes a living at the poker tables, cause the slots sure don’t pay that well.
Okay, so now we arguably have an economist on our blog. Since he has predicted a 50% drop in IV residential housing values over the next 4 years [at least at the $1M price point], maybe he can make a prediction on a different subject that has been discussed here? Hyper-inflation.
So with the massive increase in public debt/the monetary supply SE, where do you think long term mortgage interest rates are going to be in 4 years, and what’s your reasoning which supports this prediction?
I am going to make an assumption [which may prove wrong] that you’re going to predict something higher than today. So if you are recommending that a reader such as you/your wife should wait for 4 years to make an IV residential housing purchase, how much more is his/her debt service going to cost compared to today, assuming he/she must rely upon 80% purchase money financing?
Smarten-
For somebody who appears to be of at least average intelligence, I don’t understand how you get caught up on such remedial things. Hyperinflation? Where in the world do you come up with this idea? While I would never discount inflation in the far future, perhaps even a decently high rate, hyperinflation is a preposterous notion. In such a scenario, we’d be talking about $10,000 loaves of bread and such. Were that to happen- a laughable scenario in my mind- housing prices would be irrelevant.
Furthermore, as I’ve posted time and again, it is MUCH better to purchase a house in a period of high interest rates than in a period of low rates. Why? Because as rates go up, house prices go down. Remember, housing prices are dictated by local wages, and what monthly payment those wages can afford. You seem to be under the impression that, as interest rates rise, the cost of ownership will, too, in conjunction. You’re mistaken. The difference will be made up by sellers in the way of lower prices. Also, you can always refinance the rate down the road, but you can never lower your principle. In addition, the higher the rate (hence more interest on the note), the easier it is to knock out the principle with additional payments every so often. It becomes easier to pay off the house.
Interesting question Smarten.
But first a correction. I did not say IV housing would drop by 50%. I said 2 currently priced $1mill. houses would exchange hands for less than 500K in the next 4 years.
As to your question - I suspect that both mortgage rates and 10 yr yields well pretty much be where they are right now.
Why?
Becuase I believe we are entering a phase where private debt is being replaced by government debt, which by definition, makes for far greater inefficiency. That would be accross the board.
Everyday you pick up the newspaper the govt. is rolloing out some new stimulus(spending) package.
C4C, first time home owners tax deduction, you name it.
Shite, just this morning the pres announced a new stimulus for small business. Sometime this has got to end. Now I agree, this vast printing is worrisome, but, for inflation to occur, their has to be velocity, or put more simply, demand. And right now demand is moribund.
What worries me the most is the fed seems to be following the Japanese disease to the tee. Look at our zombie Banks(Citi,BAC), zombie companies(GM). These things need to be euthanised, but just like Japan did, the fed keeps them alive.
Japan is now something like in year 18 with deflation. A $500K apartment bought in 1989 in Tokyo, can now be bought for $200K. I am greatly concerned that we are heading down the same path.
BB is correct Smarten.
People buy houses based upon “howmuchamonth” they can afford. The grand price is largely irrelevant.
Also, an important point which I think you are missing, is that when all is said and done,it is the buyer who ultimately sets the price(that is because they can wait longer).
Thats why these real estate shills have it all wrong. If interest rates rise, the howuchamonth” value will decrease, and inevitably so will house prices.
Sane - your exact quote was ‘But I’m willing to bet anyone that todays $1 million asking price in IV, will exchange hands at 500k sometime in the next 4 years.
Any takers?’
Thanks SE -
I asked for your prediction re: mortgage rates 4 years out, and you gave it. Thank you.
BTW, my definition of hyper-inflation is NOT that a $2 loaf of bread ends up costing $10K. If it ends up costing $20, that’s enough to qualify. But again, I guess we need to define our terms.
And as DBNO points out, your initial wager was NOT fixed to two particular $1M SFRs reselling for under $500K 4 years [as contrasted to within 4 years] from now. I guess it was my mistake to take your offer literally; sorry.
And insofar as your observation that “people buy houses based upon ‘howmuchamonth’ they can afford [the grand price (being) largely irrelevant],” that doesn’t literally equate to people’s earnings nor wages - it does equate to what they can afford. So to the extent BB or anyone else makes the literal comparison wages, IMO, he/she is wrong.
For a simple example of the principle, just look at the Bay Area. For decades [up until the last year] the homebuyers’ affordability index [based upon average wages] has been at less than 20%. Yet look at what happened to home prices.
My two cents.
BB, you are spot on. Corollaries to your comments:
* house prices are going to be pressured for many years to come as most predict interest rates will by necessity generally rise in the years to come.
* prices paid by a buyer are dictated generally by the buyer’s ability to repay a loan using real wages. Inflation in the energy and govt sectors (taxes), and soon in the govt mandated health sector, translate to fewer disposable dollars for a home mortgage. This leads to decreasing prices paid for homes, or to further foreclosures of existing mortgages which then leads to decreasing price comps for homes. As BB points out repeatedly, unless and until real wages (and I add the distinction of ‘disposable incomes’) rise, inflation will be unable to occur in the housing sector in any meaningful way. Therefore, I believe you’ll pay more for loaves of bread, et.al. but less for homes going forward in the foreseeable future.
* I’ve posited my theory for a long time and no one has refuted it (please do): the reason we had home price appreciation to the degree we did in the last inflationary shock period of the late 70’s / early 80’s when rates were double-digit was due to the demographic shift of massive numbers of babyboomers starting families and needing homes, particularly starter homes. Now and in the years to come, these same boomers will be selling and downsizing particularly larger homes, putting more pressure on home prices into the foreseeable future.
A quick story on the importance of getting the best deal possible, but not necessarily the best financing to make a deal happen: Buying a car some years ago, I introduced myself as a commercial lending officer who was well versed in financial matters. This was not to brag as if my career is any loftier than a burger flipper, but rather to tell the salesman not to bother giving me the used-car slimy sales pitch of some slick financing to make a deal. No, I just want the best price on the car, period. He disappears to his obligatory ‘sales manager’ and comes back literally a new person: the slick, slimy used-car type proverbial sales guy appeared out of the nice consultative guy I’d just visited with, but I digress. He launched into “what if I could get your payment to $x/mo over Y years!!!!!”. Annoyed and insulted, I plugged his metrics into my HP 12C and hit the INT [calculate interest] button. Without even looking at the screen, I held it up to him and asked him why on earth I would sign up for such a loan? I then turned the calculator back to see the result: 12.55% in a 5.75-6.5% ‘ish’ market. Had there been this same car at any other dealer in the county, I would gladly have poured my coffee down his shirt and walked out, but instead he came back with a loan on my terms at, you guessed it, around 5.75%. I don’t even recall what I paid for the car, but I’ll never forget that 12.55% rate and that it would have added nearly $5K to the car over the term. It would have also resulted in a loan balance 5 yrs later when I sold it much, much greater than the car’s worth.
My, my. I see so many parallels in my story to the housing market we just came out of: the bad reputations so many Realtors and loan officers have earned as ‘used car salesmen’ (my sincere apologies to used car salesmen!), the subprime and I/O loans being offered in order to support ever-higher home prices, the negative amortization over time, etc. Sadly, today’s govt still acting like the slimy salesman by making accessible bad financing, and there continue to be many home buyers overpaying for homes simply because of slick financing options. No, we are not out of this mess yet, certainly not until we can educate consumers that financing should not drive a purchase decision.
“So to the extent BB or anyone else makes the literal comparison wages, IMO, he/she is wrong.”
You can have that opinion, everyone is entitled to theirs, but you have offered nothing to back it up. I find it humorous that oftentimes when you are stymied by one of my posts, you resort to the “he/she” dig. You’ve known I’m a guy for years. Funny, though.
“For a simple example of the principle, just look at the Bay Area. For decades [up until the last year] the homebuyers’ affordability index [based upon average wages] has been at less than 20%. Yet look at what happened to home prices.”
Earth to Smarten: Reno is NOT the Bay Area. Reno is NOT New York City. Reno is Reno. Apples to oranges my friend. I’ve had to correct you time and again on this, and I would have thought you’d have learned. But, alas, you’re just stubborn. It’s also clear that you don’t like to hear that you may have overpaid by more than a half million for your IV house (a different market than Reno, too), so you grasp, and you grasp, and you grasp.
japanese style asset deflation or surging
inflation caused by massive defecits/balance of
trade (twins towers of debt)
what was japan’s budget like during that era to
compare their situation to ours? or other items
to compare japan 1987-2007 to usa now?
i’m trying to figure out how similar or not japan is to usa’s—-any input will be appreciated
Bob c,
Japans crisis began in 1989. At that time their debt to GDP ratio was 50%. Currently they are at 178%.
In the last year we have gone from 14 to 41%. This is what I worry about.
Bottom line is, just like Japan, I don’t think we will have inflation until we “take our medicine”.
Meaning letting these zombie companies go bust. Or put another way, returning to the free market system. Of course that will likely push unemployment to the 20% level, and I don’t think ther’s much political will to do that.
So we find ourselves between a rock and a hard place.
Which leads me to ask people like Raging Bull, how exactly do housing prices go up in this sort of environment?
MLS #937526 - 886 Rosewood Circle listed at $990K
MLS #938558 - 809 Rosewood Circle listed at $995K
MLS #938557 - 826 Rosewood Circle listed at $995K
MLS #938556 - 832 Rosewood Circle listed at $995K
MLS #938409 - 869 Rosewood Circle listed at an even $1M
This project would have been long gone via foreclosure if it wasn’t for a very “deep pocket” investor.
73 NOD’s in Washoe County on a single day last week and only one recorded NOD on a condo in IV.
I forgot to mention..On of the Incline Creek Estates(Rosewood)foreclosed went back to the foreclosing lender and just resold for $970,000.
BB, when I referred to “he/she,” I wasn’t speaking only to you [didn’t I say “BB or anyone else?”]. So no added offense was intended to you by my he/she reference. Believe me, when I’m responding directly to you, I won’t hide it!
And BB, thanks for allowing me to have my own opinion.
And nothing you’ve said changes it. For purposes of my point, it doesn’t matter that Reno/Sparks is a different housing market than the Bay Area [or New York for that matter]. People are by and large going to pay what they can afford to pay wherever they choose to live. If they can afford to pay all cash and that is their choice, they will [regardless of what their earnings, if any, may total]. If they sold several years ago and are sitting on a boat load of cash, they probably can afford to pay more for a home than what the average wage earner can afford. So when you make the generic assertion that the housing market won’t turn around until prices are in line with the mortgage cost the average local wage earner can afford to pay, I must disagree with you and I have.
And that was my point about the Bay Area. For decades the average Bay Area wage earner hasn’t been able to afford the mortgage necessary to purchase an average priced home. Yet that hasn’t stopped sales, nor the increase in pricing [and this metric goes farther back than the proliferation of exotic mortgages]. Aren’t these “facts” which back up my statements? If so, then I believe I am entitled to assert the same concept applies everywhere, including Reno/Sparks. We can already see from this blog there are a lot of would be buyers who are sitting on the sidelines as renters, for whatever the reasons. Many can “afford” to pay more than the median sales price, yet won’t. But that doesn’t mean housing prices must drop further because these would be buyers can’t afford to pay today’s prices.
And insofar as my overpaying by $500K, you’re mistaken my friend. IV is not Reno/Sparks [do I have to keep reminding you?]. Nor can you make blanket price comparisons to IV SFRs like you can to cookie cutter housing in Somersett, Damonate Ranch, Spanish Springs, etc. [didn’t I just demonstrate this point with SE?].
It has been almost four months now since our purchase. Three weeks ago the custom house next store to ours consisting of less square footage and lower end construction/amenities sold for some $80K more than our purchase price. Although I am the first to admit that the fat lady has certainly not yet sung, so far, I’ve neither had to nor am I “grasping” for anything [sorry to burst your bubble]. Of course when you have no skin in the game, it’s easy to say and hear whatever you want to say and hear; isn’t it?
Bear and Move to Reno- I never bought the whole “people are friendlier here” argument. People are the same everywhere…if you’re friendly you’ll get it back in return.
Willk- Surprise! we have dirty diapers on the street and bums here too.
Move to Reno- It is a fallacy that the nuke dump would have brought billions in $$$…I don’t recall Pres. Bush offering any such money when he tried to force it on the state.
Skeptical- Nevada’s more completely FUBAR than California. Our deficits are close to their per capita, but they have a more diversified, high income industry that isn’t dependent on tourism, the first to fall in a recession. They also have most of the nation’s finest shools and colleges in the nation. Inability to govern? We’re close to that. And OUR taxes will go up too.
Sully’s right…it’s build it and they will come. We need to beef up education here and remake ourselves as a high-tech (no longer dependent on nickel slots and big box stores) and build the workforce Dirtbagger found lacking here.
Why are our local politicians giving STAR bonds to almost-minimum-wage businesses???
The “nuke dump” issue is not as clear as Mr. Rusin indicates. Indeed, had the feds “forced” the dump on Nevada, the positive impact on Nevada’s economy likely would have been relatively minor. However, had Nevada agreed to the dump, concessions (pecuniary and otherwise) from the federal government would have been included in the terms of the deal. Nevada’s shortsighted politicians fought the dump without valid reason, using fear mongering to make sure the populace followed like sheep.
Of course, the repository is not a dead issue yet. Even though the administration has announced that Yucca Mountain is no longer the designated repository site, Congress has not changed the relevant law, and perhaps even more telling, the House included funding for the Yucca Mountain repository in the 2010 budget.
If Reid loses in 2010, I for one will not be surprised if the administration moves forward with the Yucca Mountain project with or without the state’s approval. I believe we should make a deal now to make sure Nevada has some oversight of and gains some benefit from the repository.
Smarten-
You’re coming across as a completely illogical bonehead. I would have expected more from you, but I think you’re a hopeless case, desperate to justify your recent purchase.
You say:
“If they sold several years ago and are sitting on a boat load of cash, they probably can afford to pay more for a home than what the average wage earner can afford. So when you make the generic assertion that the housing market won’t turn around until prices are in line with the mortgage cost the average local wage earner can afford to pay, I must disagree with you and I have.”
These people you speak of are statistical outliers. They do not carry a market, especially one the size of the greater Reno/Sparks area. If you look at the historical pricing in the area, pre-bubble, it has ALWAYS been supported by median incomes. If I’m to understand your diatribe correctly- you’re preaching the “new paradigm” that the Realtor shills were vomiting forth during the frenzy. Absolutely unbelievable. This is nothing more than the “rich Californian theory” Reno Ignoramus put to rest long, long ago. It seems that you’ve just turned into a complete shill. Are you a Realtor, now? Seriously.
Further:
“And that was my point about the Bay Area. For decades the average Bay Area wage earner hasn’t been able to afford the mortgage necessary to purchase an average priced home. Yet that hasn’t stopped sales, nor the increase in pricing [and this metric goes farther back than the proliferation of exotic mortgages]. Aren’t these “facts” which back up my statements?”
Smarten- this is NOT the Bay Area. Are you that dense? Just as I wouldn’t compare Modesto to SF, or Reno to Tahoe (I have NEVER compared the two, and you can research my posts where I have gone on record to say that they are two different animals), you cannot compare the Reno/Sparks to the Bay Area. You’ve got “Bay Area” on the brain. You’re not there anymore Smarten. You’re in a second home market which is on the rocks. You called the bottom, and you bought something. Great. Enjoy it. But quit the horsesh!t.
Lastly, the money quote was:
“…I believe I am entitled to assert the same concept applies everywhere, including Reno/Sparks”
Then:
“IV is not Reno/Sparks [do I have to keep reminding you?].”
You lost all credibility with me after that nonsense, Smarten. You’re nothing more than Derrick with an editor.
“had Nevada agreed to the dump, concessions (pecuniary and otherwise) from the federal government would have been included in the terms of the deal.”
Really….where did you get this information??
John Rusin wrote:
“Sully’s right…it’s build it and they will come. We need to beef up education here and remake ourselves as a high-tech (no longer dependent on nickel slots and big box stores) and build the workforce Dirtbagger found lacking here.”
Plenty of smart people born and bred in Reno. They leave because the jobs just aren’t here. The low wage jobs draw people from other areas. Take a look at the casino and warehouse workers and the majority of them are out of staters. The educated locals either take over mom and dads business, start their own, manage to wrangle a decent paying job in Reno (of the few that exist), or head out for greener pastures.
From a contact in the NDEP who, unfortunately, is now retired.
BB; back in the “early days” San Jose was the same way. People wanting to leave the “cow town” for greener pastures. WWII brought many to Santa Clara County via Moffet Field. Many returned to retire in the “valley of hearts delight”.
Amongst them were some very smart people, Lockheed Space and Missiles Division, NASA etc.
It took a few decades, but it went from a cow town to the tenth largest city in the nation.
I don’t want that here, but look what happens when you take your head out of the sand and get off your heinie.
My opinion is that Nevada could have bargained for a “temporary” nuclear depository at Yucca Mountain. that was limited solely to “dry cask” storage. Perfectly safe both in transit and storage. Set it up as a long-term lease deal, say 500 years, with lease payments starting at $1 billion per year with COLA provisions.
I only mention it because it would be a real estate transaction.
Interesting idea, Move to Reno, but as Yucca Mountain is federal property, the state could not “lease” it to the federal government. The federal government was able to proceed with the project without state approval because it owns the proposed site (although commerce clause powers are also implicated).
The concessions, as I understand it, would have involved federal funds for infrastructural improvements (roads, rail, hazmat response teams, etc.), funds for NDEP oversight of transportation of waste materials in the state, and regulatory concessions regarding environmental standards, superfund sites, etc.
Agreed except this is a political issue. Why is the federal govt getting involved with radioactive waste that is own by private utilities?
The bottom line is that there are probably equally good sites as Yucca Mountain in at least 10 other States. Nevada was selected because of its history as an A-bomb testing place and its political weight at the time.
If the utilities want to dump their nuclear waste in Nevada they should pay for it.
.
To John Rusin… This is common business sense… the rest of the States with Nuclear Power need Yucca to work… we should get paid.
I am a degreed ChE, and many would call me a tree hugger. I strongly believe in Yucca as an Intermediate (<120 yr) storage area until we learn how to re-process.
I also believe in John Newell’s case, that we should leverage this great environmental and business need to the advantage of current permanent residence. We can offer it to them for… cash for K1 - K12 education,,, pay our taxes… so we can cut high tech business taxes… luring the highend CA evacuees.
At first I thought this may not fit the RRB topic line, however the more I think about it… the more important now than ever for NV and the country. We could use the additional tax income to offset those for high-tech, high-paying business tax incentives…. and the US could then build more clean Nuclear Energy… helping contruction in the near term… and creating a new industry that lessens our foreign oil dependence and creates a truly sustainable industry growth in a core business segment.
The idea that Nevada ought to cooperate with Yucca and seek compensation for it is not new. For at least twenty years, former Gov. Bob List has publicly advocated the idea. No other politician, of either party, has ever come forward to agree with List. Rather, the opposite has happened, to the extent that no Nevada politician can claim bona fides unless he/she goes on record as opposing the project.
Smarten-
I might have been a little hard on you there. Didn’t mean to sound so harsh, it’s just that I was flabbergasted by your posts. There is no comparison between you and Derrick. For that, I apologize. That was a low blow. You’re a smart man, and that’s why I am so confounded by some of the things you said. We’ve gone round and round about interest rates, inflation, and many things over the years, and we’ve definitely got some opposing viewpoints, so I’ll agree to disagree on things with you. But, you better not pull a disappearing act should my prognostications prove true.
Commodity and import inflation, wage and asset stagnation, continued low interest rates is my prediction.
time to take some more meds BB.
mr. bipolar
Wrong. List went to Elko about 10 years ago and got the city council, county commission and members of the local community college on board. They humped his leg like crazy over this deal. Great Basin College stood to gain from Yucca Mtn expanding and becoming viable. Elko stood to gain due to transportation connections.
The problem was that List just doesn’t have credibility statewide and the old argument he packed around –we can become like Alaskans and get pay for every resident for taking nuke waste! — didn’t fly. There is a world of difference when your state is selling off a natural resource like OIL compared to sucking in waste like NUCLEAR WASTE.
Sane Economist,
Just like an economist to guess that in four years “both mortgage rates and 10 yr yields well pretty much be where they are right now.”
Well, heck. And the skies opened up and the birds where chirping and light shone in the darkness. Thanks for your amazing insight. How many years did you go to school for that?
I suggest you read “The Black Swan” by Nasim Taleb. You just might learn something.
As it stands, your credibility is shot.
The correct answer is “I don’t know, and neither does anyone else on the planet. And anyone trying to hazard a guess beyond six months is either an idiot or a shill.” But I guess they didn’t teach that at the JC where you got your degree…
As for why home prices will increase in the coming years? You cannot “monetize the debt” and print trillions and trillions of pieces of paper without devaluing that paper. This is an historic experiment and it will end horribly — just like Weimar and Zimbabwe.
So, the underlying, real value of RE will likely go nowhere, but the wheelbarrows of paper needed to purchase said real estate will multiply exponentially, roughly correlated to the debasement of our once proud currency.
Sully, I probably should have added that the family involved in the quick dive house exchange short sale extravaganza were a combination of lawyers and doctors.
johnny posted:
“time to take some more meds BB.
mr. bipolar”
This comment actually had me erupting in laughter. Anybody familiar with Derrick’s posts over the years will see the irony in this. From somebody who has posted under at least 15 different aliases, and who changes positions with the temperature, he’s definitely got experience with this particular subject matter. What ARE the meds for such an affliction, Derrick? Tell us what’s in your medicine cabinet. Then, we’ll understand better your need to present yourself in multiple different lights. My guess is you just didn’t get enough love as a child. Sad, sad, sad.
Thank you for your apology BB, which is accepted. There are a number of subjects we agree upon, and there are a number we don’t. Neither of us is shy in sharing our views and I very much respect yours [minus the name calling]. I haven’t gone anywhere [unlike Mr. Murray], and I have no intentions of so doing. Unlike others, I’ve put my money where my mouth is and I’ve shared what I’ve done as well as the reasons why [in part to garner your criticism, and in part to hopefully help others in a similar position]. If it ultimately turns out that I made a bad decision, so be it [at least my eyes were open before I did]. However so far I haven’t, and you should cut me some slack.
So have a nice day.
CL -
I just wanted to comment on how I very much appreciated reading your car purchase story. I think many of us have experienced something[s] very similar.
However sometimes the financing can make up for price [or at least act as that little added incentive if the price isn’t precisely where we’d like it to be]. So when car manufacturers offered 0% financing [OAC of course] because banks essentially weren’t lending, in my mind that represented an incentive that made up for price. And when the government offered the first time homebuyers’ tax credit [even though one doesn’t technically need to be a first time homebuyer], that too was an incentive that made up for price [at least $8K worth of price].
Now if that $8K turns into $15K and it is made retroactive [as is being proposed], then whoever took a chance and became a first time homebuyer, is going to be rewarded.
And now that ALL Incline Village residential real estate assessments are being rolled back to 2002-03 levels and refunds for excess property taxes paid are in fact going to be processed by Washoe County, whoever took a chance and purchased IV residential real estate is going to be rewarded with lower A/V and lower property taxes. And if anyone anticipated this eventuality and included in his/her purchase contract an assignment of his/her seller’s right to such property tax refunds, then he/she is going to be rewarded even more so.
Now if we believe Mr. Econ, very low mortgage rates will remain for at least 4 years and there’s no reason to jump into any purchase that would require a mortgage. But if we don’t share his views [and I personally don’t], obtaining historically low purchase money mortgage financing now during this window of opportunity may actually offset the “uncertainty” [or according to some, the inevitability] of home prices creeping lower. Again, the potential for a “reward” that transcends price.
My point CL - it’s not always just the price. But again, I enjoyed your story and look forward to more.
Smarten-
You did put your money where you mouth is, and I admire that. You bought a house which you can easily afford, and that’s all that matters. It really is nice, BTW.
We have different takes on the IV market, and it’ll be interesting to see how things play out. I look forward to this winter/spring. Lots of people still burning cash. At some point, they’ll cut bait.
I had 9 offers — 1 at asking and 8 over
and my low end 95120 home sold first weekend
on market
The strategy was to price it a hair under market
and attract a crowd
100 people came through home saturday….almost
as many sunday
1 guy wrote a nice all cash offer that expired
in 4 hours on sunday as he sensed the interest
my realtor told me not to accept it—i got
even higher offers
and there’s always a few bears around ‘your
realtor stinks–he underpriced your home’
and ‘you should have priced your home way
higher got even more’
This is a high 6 figure home—i am dumbfounded
by what occured
Hey Bob -
I’d like the name/telephone number of your agent. I have something in zip code 95118 I’d like to sell. If you don’t feel comfortable sharing it on the blog, Guy will give you my e-mail address.
Congratulations; I too am dumbfounded by what you recount! 100 lookyloos on a Saturday?
smarten; 95118 is where I’m from - what street is it on?
jerry ferguson broker/agent
universal listing
408-234-8390
408-997-1000
jerry@thinkuniversal.net
he is a retired banker…..his wife and son are
part of his team
a modest , honest person that needs the business
(he did handyman work here too and staged beautifully)—he was offered the buy agent
comission by two of the bidders to have his
son represent them and I said okay…..but he declined for ethical reasons (his son painted
and his wife budget shopped for things I needed
to upgrade before I came to market)
honest, trustworthy and happy to go the extra mile
please call him
keep talking sh*T about my personal life BB. that way when I see you in public I can give you my dentists business card.
if you want to talk trash about me, then by all means go ahead.
If you want to bring my personal life and family into it, then don’t EVER let me see in public PUNK
BTW that is not a threat, merely a warning.
further, I will slap a lawsuit on your ass faster than you can say uncle, for public defamation.
Derrick,
Why don’t you just post under one moniker, its quite oblivious from your demeanor who you are.
That being said, I agree with your comment regarding personal attacks. But an even better way might be to simply disagree with a person and your reasons for doing so rather then outright ridiculing them. Its also less stressful for everyone.
Just a thought.
Thanks Bob -
I will give Jerry a call.
And Sully, I can’t believe you’re in 95118.
The street name is Scossa.
Again sharing personal info which I should think twice about doing with this crowd, some of you may recall that I invest in deeds of trust. Well here was a condo that I made a junior loan against two years ago. As property values went down in this “prime” part of San Jose [not], my borrowers chose to walk away rather than continue paying. So now I’m stuck with a problem - I have workers over there as we speak doing renovation work. Then I must sell or rent it out.
But here’s the interesting part. With pre-payment penalties, delinquent payments, unpaid principal, interest, foreclosure fees, delinquent property taxes, delinquent HOA dues and a senior mortgage in default [that I’m going to have to cure on my former borrowers’ behalf], they are looking at about $250K in indebtedness that they’ve been “relieved” of. And given this property was a rental for them, they’re facing a hell of a tax problem [can you imagine what $250K of additional income would do to your personal tax situation?] in California where there’s state as well as federal income taxes to be paid. I’m filling out the 1099 as we speak.
Smarten,
Good input on rates and financing terms. My point is, perhaps more specifically, slick financing terms are not THE reason to buy. Certainly they can be an incentive or can throw an otherwise neutral decision over the top, but do watch out the unintended consequences. More specifically my point is that financing should not trump the price paid. Financing always adds to the costs, never takes away from the cost, while a better price paid will always be just that, a better price paid. Dunno how to defend anyone who stretches to buy more simply because of some slick financing terms. Normal, non-toxic mortgage to buy a home with reasonable foreseen ability to make enough money to repay the loan? Fully understood. Buying a home 10x your salary simply because you have 5 yr I/O teaser rates? Heck no. Buying a $40K car when $25K was your budget simply because of a used-car-sales-gimmicky financing package? Sad.
Any of that make sense? I believe your perspective is that your financing terms were accretive to your otherwise positive buying decision. Good. You got a low price, put cash down, plan to stay indefinately, have ability to repay the loan, etc. But my point is a vast many perhaps majority of home buyers in this last cycle bought the 10X home on slick financing terms. Either they suddenly make a ton more income, or they are defaults-in-waiting. Many of those defaults in waiting would have been avoided either because they would otherwise have not bought at all or would have a much more managably sized mortgage. We are seeing this play out now and my further point is we are no where close to being done with this distress in the markets caused by people who over-bought simply because of lending gimmicks.
Final note. I looked at vehicle purchases with 0% rates when they were all the rage. What I found was without exception I would either be paying more than I could otherwise have paid for the car with cash or a 3rd party loan at market rates, or I was being offered this 0% rate on cars I did not want to own. I saw in the end not a single vehicle I would buy using the 0% financing gimmick. (Happy to hear others’ examples to the contrary, though I am already too far afield of real estate.)
smarten, your place isn’t too far from where I was. I have friends on Luning a couple of blocks away.
Good input CL -
One little side note.
About 1-1/2 years ago I helped a 21 year old, recent college grad niece buy a new Scion. The factory was offering below market financing and a $400 recent college graduate rebate. The only financing she could qualify for was at 12% plus so I went on the loan with her and I think we got 5.2% [a pretty good auto loan rate back them] with only $500 down. But when it came time for the recent college graduate rebate, Toyota Financial Services balked. They claimed my niece had to qualify for the financing on her own in order to take advantage of the rebate. In other words similar to your story, you only get the rebate if you agree to pay 12% plus on an auto loan when the going rate is 5.2%. What a racket!
And then about 4 months ago Pentagon Federal Credit Union started offering 3.99% auto loans. I couldn’t qualify for a Penfed mortgage, but my niece with only a part time job and no money in the bank qualified for a 3.99% auto loan refinance! Go figure.
OMG, that’s funny. Classic! Truth hurts, does it Derrick? Can’t take your own medicine?
I’ve seen pictures of you, and to be honest I don’t think you could beat your way out of a wet paper bag. Noodle arms and a beer gut are hardly something I fear. Nice try, though. Thanks for the laugh.
PS- I’m bigger than you, buddy, and I’ve a feeling your tone would be quite different in person. You’re very lucky I’m not a loose cannon, because you have foolishly posted your picture, place of employment and other pieces of information which somebody could easily use to bring harm to you. You should be more careful in the future. You’re going to mouth off to the wrong person, and your dentist is going to be working overtime.
While we’re on the subject of legal action, Derrick, let me be quite clear. You have, on more than one occasion, threatened me with physical violence on this blog. It is archived. You’re the last person on this blog who should be threatening ANYONE with a lawsuit. Be smart, Derrick, or you’re going to get yourself into some real trouble.
Best not to post ANY personal information here, Smarten, for obvious reasons.
Noodle arms and beer gut? Now THAT one I could have called right.
In light of all the euphoric sentiment here (irrational exuberance), it’s time to scratch the surface of the current housing market to show people what’s REALLY going on. More and more stories are hitting the mainstream media about rampant fraud in regards to the $8k tax credit, but even more troubling are the stories of unqualified buyers “qualifying” for homes. It seems that, while they are verifying employment, credit scores, etc., the lenders are still willing to assist in the financial suicide of borrowers, at the expense of FHA and taxpayers, as they ignore healthy DTI ratios, lack of down payment funds, and other crucial factors which determine whether or not a prospective buyer can truly afford a residence.
20 Year Old Buys Home With $183,000 FHA Loan And Just 3.5% Down
“Denise Tejada bought a house last month at the age of 20, thanks in large part to a loan guaranteed by the Federal Housing Authority.
Without question, Tejada’s loan is toxic–to her and to the taxpayers who are backing the loan. Her house cost $155,000. Tejada’s loan was apparently made on a micro-down payment of just 3.5%, the minimum down payment to qualify for an FHA loan. On top of this, however, she got an additional government backed loan to make improvements. Her total loans amount to $183,0000. In short, she was immediately underwater on her new house.
The monthly payments on her debt amount to $1328. Her income is $2470, leaving her with just $285 a week to live on. She’s paying 54% of her income to make the mortgage payments. She earns that income by holding down one full time and two part time jobs.”
http://www.businessinsider.com/20-year-old-buys-home-with-183000-fha-loan-and-just-35-down-2009-10
Housing recovery? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
Smarten,
Great comment. Financial gimmicks. “If its too good to be true…..”
****
Derrick/Johnny and BB,
Sorry to state, and not looking to pick written fights - I’m tired of it and the RRB readers are too - but guys, please give it up already! Ask Guy to put you in touch directly, off line, with each other and go duke it out in an alley somewhere. Let the rest of us return to the blog’s mission. You both, yes both, sound as if you go in/out of your meds or the bottle from time to time and have lost much if not all credibility here. I’m not qualified to speak to either of you personally, of course, but reading your posts, you both act as if you need a break, help, or just to move on. Ironically, you both have very good posts from time to time, but seriously, enough already guys….
I’m already over it, CommercialLender. Sounds like you need to move on, too.
too funny
Many months ago, maybe even a year ago (I can’t recall precisely), there was a long discussion here on the RRB about how FHA is the new subprime. Like everything else in this market implosion, though, it will take about 3 years before that reality is acknowledged.
I have a niece who has a 600 FICO who just bought a $175,000 REO house with an FHA 3.5% down loan ($6125 down), at 5.125% interest, and the $8000 credit.
This all sounds great, and it would be, except for the fact that she can’t afford the house. When I talked to her about being able to make the payment, and all the OTHER expenses of home ownership, her response was that all she was putting into was $6,000, and if she lost that, oh well.
I give it less than a year before the default is recorded.
This sort of thing is not what is going to lead to a real estate market recovery, IMHO.