How long do you have to wait (after a short sale/foreclosure) to get a new loan?

A reader of the blog recently asked, “How long would a person who had a foreclosure and/or a short sale have to wait to reacquire a good enough credit score to again be able to qualify for a loan in today’s lending environment?”

I received this info sheet from Sue Barry, a Branch Manager at iMortgage, that shows the required wait times for obtaining a loan after going through a bankruptcy, foreclosure, and short sales.

Check it out by clicking on the picture below.

Posted in Foreclosures | Tagged , | 19 Comments

FCT’s Market Condition Report – February 2012

Below please find February’s Market Condition Report for the Northern Nevada area provided by our friends at First Centennial Title Company of Nevada.

The February Market Condition Report shows the ratio of supply to demand is solidly in the green for Reno, Sparks and Fernley. What does green indicate? From the report…

The Ratio of Supply to Demand measures the number of units of supply relative to the number of closings per month (demand). All other things being equal, the smaller this number, the tighter the area market. Green formatting signals relatively tight markets in the area segment. Weeks Supply Given Demand is the absorption rate (the number of weeks required to exhaust current supply given current demand).

Click on the report below to enlarge…

Posted in Market Trends | Tagged , | 1 Comment

What’s your passion?

If you haven’t heard, the Reno-Sparks Convention & Visitors Authority has unveiled the newest marketing campaign to promote tourism to the Reno-Tahoe area. The tagline… “What’s Your Passion?”

According to Christopher Baum, RSCVA President and CEO, “The campaign is designed to inform potential visitors that whatever their personal passion, Reno Tahoe USA has what they’re looking for.” See the story here: What’s Your Passion?

So when it comes to all that Reno-Tahoe offers, what’s your passion?

Related post: A Little West of Center

Posted in News | Tagged , | 14 Comments

“…buying is cheaper than renting.”

Thank you to a reader of the blog for passing along the links below to a story from KTVN Channel 2 news reporter, John Potter.

In Reno-Sparks Home Prices Challenge the Rental Market, John Potter reports that the apartment vacancy rate in Reno is down to a low of just 6.5%, and the average monthly rent is $822.

But with house prices at record lows, as John reports, “At this point, if you find a good deal on a house, buying is cheaper than renting.” See the video below.

Also, for an in-depth report from Johnson-Perkins & Associates on Reno apartment vacancies and rental costs, broken down by neighborhoods, click here: Apartment Survey Q4 2011 [Note: this 34-page report takes a while to load.]

Posted in Market Trends | Tagged , | 15 Comments

Washoe County insured recording statistics – February 2012

Below are Washoe County’s insured recording statistics for the month of February. Recording statistics are provided by our friends at Ticor Title.

Click on the image below to enlarge…

  • February Resales in Washoe County rose 2 percent over January’s number, and are up over 8 percent year-over-year.
  • Re-fi’s continue to climb (up over 5 percent over January’s number) and are at a level not seen since December 2010.
  • February new home sales in Washoe County climbed more than 16 percent over January’s number, and are up over 63 percent year-over-year. Perhaps those analysts are correct in their projections.

related posts:

Posted in Market Trends | Tagged | 3 Comments

Updates on area high-tech developments

This story appeared in print in Sunday’s RGJ: High-tech rebirth: Talks renewed for stalled Reno redevelopment program

It’s an interesting piece about the proposed 2,200-acre data center project located 11-miles east of Sparks, as well as renewed interest in the downtown development known as Téssera a district that could contain restaurants, retail and office space.

Posted in Developers, Developments, Downtown Reno | Tagged | Leave a comment

Home builder stocks surge

Friday saw a rally in the homebuilders sector on analysts’ upgraded ratings and projections for national homebuilders. Some stocks in the sector rose as much as 6 percent on Friday. See the story here: Builders rally on improved real estate outlook

One analyst expects homebuilder stock to rise 18 percent this year, and 19 percent in 2013.

Posted in Developers | Tagged | 2 Comments

February median sold price, units, DOM, $/sq.ft.

Rebound! February’s median sold price jumped 7.4 percent over January’s $135,000 to return to $145,000. This 7.4 percent increase follows the 12.9 percent fall we saw in January. Volatility is the word of the day. Year-over-year, February’s median sold price is down 9.9 percent.

February’s median sold price per square foot (ppsf) also increased – rising 1.6 percent to $82.12/sf. Sold PPSF is down 12 percent year-over-year.

The number of houses sold in February set another month-specific record. February’s 453 units sold eclipsed the number of houses sold in any other February on record. The increase sales activity, in conjunction with less properties entering the market, has wreaked havoc with inventory levels. At the moment there are only 980 houses listed as Active on the MLS. By itself this number may not mean much, but when looked at alongside the number of monthly sales, one can see that our market is operating with roughly only a two-month supply of inventory. 980 Active for-sale properties is also noteworthy in that this number is lower than the inventory levels the market experienced during the peak of the buying frenzy during the bubble years.

I first brought the dwindling inventory point to light in October – see Looming inventory problem in Reno-Sparks? At that time, the months supply of inventory was at 3.7 months. It is now at 2.2 months. Folks, we’re in a Seller’s market. Of course, the lack of inventory is not seen across all price points, but at and around the median sold price there is shortage of available Active listings. This thin supply is being manifested as multiple offers scenarios, offers over asking price, lower days on market, and higher incidence of cash offers (see Cash is King – more than ever).

Speaking Days on Market (DOM), I see that our MLS has added a new metric to the search results – median days on market. Regular readers know that the DOM number I report has always been an average, rather than a median. That’s because average DOM was the only metric available to me. Not so any longer. I have updated the table below with median DOM going back about a year. I will fill out the remainder of the historical data when I have more time. I have also left the average DOM in place as a comparison to the median DOM. Going forward, I think I will use only the median DOM. This will be consistent with my use of the medians for the other metrics on which I report. Let me know your thoughts on this?

So, looking at the median DOM for February we can see that the trend has certainly been toward shorter times on the market. This is because many of the properties hitting the market are going pending almost immediately – or at least as soon as the Seller chooses which offer to select. February’s median DOM of 99 days is more than two weeks shorter than February 2011′s median DOM of 115 days.

February sales by type break out as follows:

  • REO sale: 42% – up from January’s 40%
  • Short sales: 28% – down from January’s 37%
  • Equity sales: 29% – UP from January’s 22%

Another effect from the low inventory level is that non-distressed home sellers are experiencing greater interest in their for-sale properties – as can be seen in the increase in “equity sales”.

February sales by price band break out as follows in the table below. Note that nearly a quarter of the houses sold in February sold for less than $100,000; 76% sold for less than $200,000; and 92% sold for less than $300,000.

sales price ($000′s) units sold
0 – 99 100
100 – 199 241
200 – 299 74
300 – 399 17
400 – 499 7
500 – 599 7
600 – 699 2
700 – 799 1
800 – 899 2
900 – 999 1
1M+ 1
total 453

For those readers who prefer the median sold price for houses and condos combined, February’s 518 sold houses, condos and town homes exhibited a combined median sold price of $132,750 – UP 6.2 percent from January’s combined median of $125,000 for 518 combined sales.

Historical data follows:

Month Year # Sold Sold Price Sold Price per Sq Ft Avg/Med DOM # of Actives # of Pendings
Feb 2012 453 $145,000 $82.12 132 / 99 980 1,788
Jan 2012 446 $135,000 $80.80 144 / 122 1,170 1,643
Dec 2011 534 $155,000 $85.66 148 / 123 1,403 1,481
Nov 2011 495 $149,012 $85.02 146 / 114 1,545 1,635
Oct 2011 496 $148,250 $84.22 145 / 106 1,682 1,646
Sep 2011 575 $149,000 $83.73 133 / 106 2,044 1,967
Aug 2011 554 $154,000 $91.34 125 / 98 1,947 1,694
July 2011 512 $149,950 $87.65 128 / 96 2,028 1,667
June 2011 538 $154,000 $90.12 123 / 89 1,990 1,689
May 2011 510 $150,000 $88.66 133 / 104 1,968 1,682
Apr 2011 436 $156,125 $89.78 137 / 104 1,914 1,593
Mar 2011 511 $160,000 $91.59 132 /113 1,906 1,497
Feb 2011 387 $161,000 $93.35 142 / 115 1,882 1,416
Jan 2011 365 $157,000 $92.35 152 / 129 1,970 1,329
Dec 2010 485 $165,000 $94.31 143 2,021 1,148
Nov 2010 398 $170,000 $96.43 139 2,060 1,376
Oct 2010 418 $174,950 $98.57 135 2,146 1,371
Sep 2010 467 $168,000 $97.52 132 2,186 1,473
Aug 2010 450 $180,000 $97.54 127 2,222 1,513
Jul 2010 415 $180,000 $101.84 128 2,158 1,580
Jun 2010 602 $170,000 $100.52 145 1,966 1,625
May 2010 450 $175,807 $102.37 138
Apr 2010 510 $179,995 $103.13 128
Mar 2010 477 $175,000 $99.14 141
Feb 2010 338 $170,000 $101.68 138
Jan 2010 346 $167,000 $97.06 134
Dec 2009 424 $178,000 $101.28 126
Nov 2009 461 $175,000 $103.61 112
Oct 2009 561 $180,000 $103.52 123
Sep 2009 520 $185,948 $103.31 128
Aug 2009 482 $179,900 $102.64 116
Jul 2009 515 $180,000 $103.45 126
Jun 2009 536 $180,317 $104.09 136
May 2009 426 $175,000 $102.29 139
Apr 2009 429 $190,000 $105.71 133
Mar 2009 369 $200,000 $105.85 133
Feb 2009 293 $205,000 $111.52 132
Jan 2009 233 $200,000 $113.04 117
Dec 2008 294 $218,950 $121.74 145
Nov 2008 269 $220,000 $122.24 152
Oct 2008 354 $230,000 $131.43 144
Sep 2008 358 $239,250 $136.72 145
Aug 2008 321 $250,000 $142.14 140
Jul 2008 397 $251,000 $145.48 139
Jun 2008 369 $262,500 $148.05 142
May 2008 314 $260,215 $152.30 134
Apr 2008 314 $275,000 $154.05 172
Mar 2008 238 $274,000 $150.93 166
Feb 2008 195 $289,000 $156.48 149
Jan 2008 165 $285,000 $170.23 146
Dec2007 228 $283,950 $167.22 143
Nov2007 204 $299,750 $172.24 126
Oct2007 241 $296,000 $173.55 116
Sep2007 230 $299,945 $179.46 114
Aug2007 311 $305,000 $182.49 118
Jul2007 300 $315,000 $189.78 113
Jun2007 329 $320,000 $196.78 104
May2007 364 $313,200 $190.81 107
Apr2007 320 $309,500 $193.93 121
Mar2007 324 $315,000 $189.61 121
Feb 2007 269 $315,000 $191.18 126
Jan 2007 245 $312,900 $199.79 133
Dec2006 291 $309,000 $193.51 114
Nov2006 281 $318,000 $197.32 111
Oct 2006 363 $312,400 $201.44 105
Sep2006 344 $314,950 $198.08 98
Aug2006 349 $325,000 $210.92 94
Jul2006 373 $335,000 $210.62 93
Jun2006 424 $339,000 $214.54 91
May2006 374 $339,950 $219.05 99
Apr2006 368 $334,600 $212.08 88
Mar2006 387 $340,000 $215.54 99
Feb 2006 283 $335,000 $217.29 101
Jan 2006 274 $365,000 $216.38 98
Dec2005 333 $355,000 $217.31 89
Nov2005 385 $349,000 $220.00 81
Oct2005 484 $359,450 $223.06 77
Sep2005 531 $354,500 $219.26 77
Aug2005 582 $360,500 $220.52 73
Jul2005 608 $353,000 $218.99 71
Jun2005 679 $350,000 $215.69 69
May2005 644 $333,250 $209.95 68
Apr2005 558 $326,750 $207.57 77
Mar2005 584 $325,000 $200.17 81
Feb 2005 342 $318,500 $197.54 88
Jan 2005 341 $310,000 $195.19 85
Dec2004 450 $312,500 $190.72 77
Nov2004 448 $309,950 $191.62 63
Oct2004 512 $299,250 $188.72 53
Sep2004 496 $292,750 $185.78 61
Aug2004 505 $285,000 $182.95 56
Jul2004 544 $304,300 $179.28 61
Jun2004 533 $285,000 $172.16 65
May2004 476 $278,750 $169.64 65
Apr2004 526 $259,950 $158.08 67
Mar2004 508 $245,000 $142.56 71
Feb 2004 365 $237,000 unavailable 81
Jan 2004 380 $228,500 unavailable 78
Dec2003 441 $240,000 unavailable 82
Nov2003 444 $220,750 unavailable 78
Oct2003 430 $219,880 unavailable 76
Sep2003 587 $223,000 unavailable 71
Aug2003 512 $220,000 unavailable 75
Jul2003 533 $210,000 unavailable 77
Jun2003 475 $207,000 unavailable 77
May2003 450 $198,950 unavailable 85
Apr2003 478 $197,750 unavailable 82
Mar 2003 428 $192,000 unavailable 77
Feb 2003 321 $186,895 unavailable 79
Jan 2003 316 $186,000 unavailable 96
Dec 2002 379 $193,500 unavailable 93
Nov 2002 423 $190,000 unavailable 82
Oct 2002 483 $189,900 unavailable 83
Sep 2002 410 $174,000 unavailable 85
Aug 2002 459 $180,000 unavailable 74
Jul 2002 469 $176,000 unavailable 83
Jun 2002 445 $185,000 unavailable 80
May 2002 470 $178,450 unavailable 77
Apr 2002 360 $169,500 unavailable 93
Mar 2002 377 $169,000 unavailable 84
Feb 2002 323 $170,900 unavailable 89
Jan 2002 269 $172,475 unavailable 99
Dec 2001 287 $182,000 unavailable 86
Nov 2001 323 $161,500 unavailable 85
Oct 2001 357 $166,500 unavailable 79
Sep 2001 355 $168,000 unavailable 81
Aug 2001 448 $160,350 unavailable 84
Jul 2001 433 $169,900 unavailable 90
Jun 2001 426 $166,225 unavailable 96
May 2001 404 $162,050 unavailable 97
Apr 2001 370 $158,750 unavailable 94
Mar 2001 385 $159,900 unavailable 97
Feb 2001 297 $159,950 unavailable 104
Jan 2001 264 $165,000 unavailable 102
Dec 2000 272 $156,500 unavailable 100
Nov 2000 355 $154,500 unavailable 93
Oct 2000 348 $153,000 unavailable 98
Sep 2000 356 $160,000 unavailable 104
Aug 2000 412 $163,375 unavailable 94
Jul 2000 368 $155,000 unavailable 110
Jun 2000 466 $165,845 unavailable 104
May 2000 363 $158,000 unavailable 105
Apr 2000 312 $155,000 unavailable 113
Mar 2000 339 $162,700 unavailable 102
Feb 2000 248 $148,000 unavailable 108
Jan 2000 223 $156,000 unavailable 113
Dec 1999 264 $155,000 unavailable 118
Nov 1999 293 $149,900 unavailable 98
Oct 1999 289 $147,895 unavailable 108
Sep 1999 311 $157,000 unavailable 106
Aug 1999 360 $148,500 unavailable 112
Jul 1999 375 $147,800 unavailable 105
Jun 1999 372 $150,000 unavailable 103
May 1999 307 $145,500 unavailable 106
Apr 1999 324 $151,700 unavailable 111
Mar 1999 308 $151,000 unavailable 121
Feb 1999 249 $148,900 unavailable 120
Jan 1999 210 $143,000 unavailable 115
Dec 1998 265 $140,000 unavailable 118
Nov 1998 280 $152,800 unavailable 126
Oct 1998 286 $142,825 unavailable 115
Sep 1998 279 $144,500 unavailable 102
Aug 1998 331 $145,000 unavailable 113
Jul 1998 335 $150,000 unavailable 108
Jun 1998 351 $148,500 unavailable 103
May 1998 302 $145,500 unavailable 99
Apr 1998 237 $148,000 unavailable 110
Mar 1998 271 $141,990 unavailable 115
Feb 1998 204 $139,000 unavailable 125
Jan 1998 167 $147,000 unavailable 129

Note: The medians table above is updated on a monthly basis. The median home price data reported covers the cities of Reno, Nevada and Sparks, Nevada [NNRMLS Area #100]. Residential data includes Site/Stick Built properties only. Data excludes Condo/Townhouse, Manufactured/Modular and Shared Ownership properties. Data courtesy of the Northern Nevada Regional MLS – March 2012. Note: This information is deemed reliable, but not guaranteed.

Related post: January median sold price, units, DOM, $/sq.ft.

Posted in Agent Insights | Tagged | 81 Comments