Distressed Properties by MLS Area

There’s been much discussion on the blog recently about distressed properties (bank owned, short sales, court sales, etc).   Currently, these types of listings account for over 40% of the properties listed on our MLS and 50% of the sales in the last thirty days.

I recently overheard a couple agents commenting about the high number of short sales in Sparks.  Curious, I decided to query the MLS and break out distressed properties by MLS area to determine if a large variability between MLS areas exists, and if so, by how much.

The table below shows what I found.

MLS Areas Ranked by % of Distressed Listings

MLS #

MLS Area

total listings

"distressed" listings %

non-distressed listings %

180

Sparks

 206

 65.0%

 35.0%

181

Sparks – East

 208

 59.4%

 40.6%

182

Sparks – Suburban

 184

 56.4%

 43.6%

103

North Valleys

 1079

 55.0%

 45.0%

140

Southeast

 133

 53.8%

 46.2%

109

Spanish Springs

 1473

 53.5%

 46.5%

143

South Meadows

 247

 46.6%

 53.4%

121

Northwest Suburban

 184

 45.4%

 54.6%

119

North

 204

 45.3%

 54.7%

141

Donner Springs

 105

 44.8%

 55.2%

123

West Suburban

 16

 37.5%

 62.5%

122

Somersett

 145

 32.4%

 67.6%

120

Northwest

 191

 28.4%

 71.6%

164

Old South Suburban

 66

 21.2%

 78.8%

163

Southwest

 307

 20.7%

 79.3%

142

Hidden Valley

 53

 18.9%

 81.1%

165

South Suburban

 221

 17.6%

 82.4%

160

Old Southwest

 145

 15.9%

 84.1%

161

West Southwest

 122

 11.5%

 88.5%

171

Southwest Suburban

 134

9.0% 

 91.0%

Click here for a map of our MLS areas.

As you can see from the table above, Sparks leads the area with 65% of the listings having some type of special condition to the sale; followed by the North Valleys (55%); Southeast Reno (53.8%) and Spanish Springs (53.5%).

Those areas with the least proportion of distressed properties include: Southwest Suburban (9.0%); West Southwest (11.5%); Old Southwest (15.9%); and South Suburban (17.6%).

Data courtesy of the Northern Nevada Regional MLS (NNRMLS) – August 2008

3 comments

  1. BanteringBear

    Just read that too, DonC. That’s huge. Taxpayers, get ready to pay for all of the bankers greedy ways! If you’re up in arms, start writing your state senators and representatives. Time to hold the PTB accountable.

  2. DonC

    The way it gets structured will be a very big deal. I haven’t seen any information on that. Most of the preferred shareholders are regional banks and S&Ls which are probably not in a great position to absorb the losses if their shares are suddenly worthless.

    Then there is the $20B in subordinated debt. I don’t know which entities own that. And then there are the credit swaps on that debt, involving all the guys who bet the debt was going into default (not actually holding any of the debt) and all the issuers which wrote insurance that it wouldn’t. Not sure what an insurable event is, but one side or the other of the swaps is going to bleed big time.

    The credit swap market just got out of hand, going from a derivative which reduced risk to a betting parlor.

    Ugly. Very ugly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *