Local agents continue to leave the business

Another 93 agents have hung up their licenses during the 1st quarter of 2010.  Washoe County now has 2,644 Active real estate licensees – this number represents a 3.4 percent decrease from 4Q 2009 as well as another new low (since I began tracking the data).  See January’s post, Number of licensed RE agents continues to drop.

The number of Washoe County agents placing their licenses in Inactive status increased slightly to 803 licensees – a 3 percent increase.

Statewide numbers show similar movements. The currently 22,139 licensed agents represents a 2.1 percent decrease from 4Q 2009.  The 5,652 inactive agents statewide represent a 2.6 percent increase.

Washoe County Licensed RE Agents
  Active Inactive Total
March 2010 2,644 803 3,447
November 2009 2,737 779 3,516
September 2009 2,737 796 3,533
August 2009 2,725 817 3,542
March 2009 2,770 1,022 3,792
December 2008 2,888 1,001 3,889
September 2008 2,791 1,011 3,802
June 2008 2,984 1,085 4,069
January 2008 3,104 1,142 4,246
October 2007 3,176 1,134 4,310
August 2007 3,229 1,137 4,366
June 2007 3,221 1,237 4,458
April 2007 3,166 1,304 4,470

 

Statewide Licensed RE Agents
  Active Inactive Total
November 2009 22,139 5,652 27,791
November 2009 22,612 5,802 28,414
September 2009 22,865 5,943 28,808
August 2009 22,920 6,066 28,986
March 2009 23,466 7,448 30,914
December 2008 24,327 7,457 31,784
September 2008 23,814 7,345 31,159
June 2008 25,986 7,518 33,504
January 2008 26,997 7,470 34,467
October 2007 28,115 6,970 35,085
August 2007 28,548 6,988 35,536
June 2007 28,763 7,418 36,181
April 2007 28,886 7,723 36,609

 

Source: Nevada Real Estate Division – April 2010
http://www.red.state.nv.us/realestate/stats/stats_history.htm

14 comments

  1. geopower

    Out of curiosity I took your sales data and agent data and put it together to get the average sales volume per active agent per month. I used the median sale price since that’s what gets posted. I know mean would have been better for calculating total sales volume, but I didn’t want to go looking for it, so results are approximate. There have been some excursions, but we are pretty close to where we were in April 2007 for sales volume per active agent. So I guess the agents who remain should still be making a living.
    volume $ per active agent
    Mar-10 $80,080,000.00 $30,287.44
    Nov-09 $80,500,000.00 $29,411.76
    Sep-09 $96,692,960.00 $35,328.08
    Aug-09 $86,711,800.00 $31,820.84
    Mar-09 $73,800,000.00 $26,642.60
    Dec-08 $64,371,300.00 $22,289.23
    Sep-08 $85,651,500.00 $30,688.46
    Jun-08 $96,862,500.00 $32,460.62
    Jan-08 $47,025,000.00 $15,149.81
    Oct-07 $71,336,000.00 $22,460.96
    Aug-07 $94,855,000.00 $29,375.97
    Jun-07 $105,280,000.00 $32,685.50
    Apr-07 $99,040,000.00 $31,282.38

  2. Guy Johnson

    geopower, thank you for doing the exercise. Interesting results.

    And, yes, some of us are still making a living.
    Btw, I always welcome new clients or referrals. 😉

  3. skeptical

    ~$30k in sales volume per agent per month?

    That’s ~$900/month in commissions (not including the broker’s share). Not enough to live on.

    So, I’ll guess that over half the agents are dormant, and a small percentage are garnering what high end sales that are still transacting.

    No matter which way you slice it, it’s a tough business. Still, don’t trust ’em any further than I can spit. Except for Guy, of course ;)…..

  4. billddrummer

    To geopower,

    Great stats, and interesting take on it.

    I wonder if the 80/20 rule applies?

    If 20% of the agents generate 80% of the sales volume, then 529 agents generated $64,064,000 in sales volume during March 2010. That works out to $121,103.97/agent, or an average commission of $3,633.11/mo.

    Better than inclinejj as far as making a living, but still a far cry from what many of us outside the business thought.

    I for one thought real estate agents made a lot more money than that.

    And for the rest? Look at it as a part-time job.

  5. Sully

    billd, If I’m not mistaken the number should have been $1816/mo. Commissions split 50/50 between buyer/seller, then again for broker and salesperson. Not sure of the exact percentage, but 1/4 of total commission seems most likely.

  6. Anonymous Coward

    As an outsider I expected low numbers per month per RE agent (as explained below) but was still surprised how low those numbers were.

    I’d partially blame the NAR, whose primary interest seems to be their own bottom line (which is maximized by maximizing the number of members) rather than the bottom line of those they allegedly represent (which is not optimized by the same conditions). I suspect their efforts to establish de-facto price-fixing of the services of their members helps to contribute to this effect.

    But that’s probably a bit unfair to the NAR. I’d expect this would happen whenever a business has low/negligible barriers to entry: it will expand until it is no longer attractive to join. And at a time when the market is contracting…

    Slate magazine had an interesting article summarizing research on this effect a few years ago: http://www.slate.com/id/2124506

    The only upside to what’s going on now is that I’d expect (or hope?) that the current thinning of the herd will improve the quality of those who remain. I would hope and expect that remaining fraction will include Guy.

  7. SkrapGuy

    When a median priced house sells at $180K, at the standard 6% commission, it is $10,800. Split one half to buyer’s realtor and one half to seller’s realtor, that is $5,400 to each. Then split 50/50 with realtor’s broker, that is $2,700. Before taxes.

    Back in 2003-2006, when a chimpanzee could have made a living selling real estate, a lot of people flocked into the business. It is more difficult to get a beautician’s license that a realtor’s license. Now, it isn’t the easy money gig it was a few years ago.

  8. Guy Johnson

    skeptical said: “Still, don’t trust ‘em any further than I can spit. Except for Guy, of course.”
    …Thank you, skeptical.

    billddrummer said: “I for one thought real estate agents made a lot more money than that.”
    …I was under the same impression when I entered this business. 😉

    Anonymous Coward said: “I would hope and expect that remaining fraction will include Guy.”
    …Thank you for your sentiments. Rest assured I will remain a part a the fraction.

  9. billddrummer

    To Sully,

    Thanks. I forgot about the agent/broker split. Is it truly 50%?

    Sounds like a great deal for the broker, not so much for the agent.

  10. smarten

    billddrummer, the broker/agent split is negotiable, just like the sales commission with your listing agent. I know top producers who have a 75%-25% or 80%-20% split. I know of others whose split with their broker is on a graduated scale. Perhaps 50%-50% for the first $X.00 in commissions; dropping to 75%-25% for the next $X.00; and so on.

    But regardless, there generally is some sort of a split [although I know of some agents that keep 100% of their commissions, but they’re required to pay a monthly “desk fee” and cover their broker with E&O insurance.

  11. MikeZ

    LOTS of agents are still part-timers. I work with 3 who have their licenses and use them to buy, not to sell.

    I would guess that he average/agent figures from the total sales data is way off for full-timers like Guy.

  12. Sully

    Seeing how the last Market condition report showed 574 sales (including Carson City and Fallon) and there are 2644 active agents in Washoe County – it seems ALL the agents are part timers. 🙂

  13. DownButNotOut

    The 80/20 rule and and the fact it’s easier to get into RE than beauticians school pretty well sums it up. Tough sledding. But I have to believe Guy is in the 20%. The rest of us in business? Well like a lot of professions other than union or government jobs, its a dogfight out there.

  14. Donna

    Most of those “active” agents don’t do much more than send in their dues every year. I would be surprised if there are more than 750 people who get up every day and go to their office to sell real estate for 40 or more hours a week. Maybe another 500 who “work part time” in the field. Go look at the Chase website and see how many of the realtors in that office have just 1 or 2 active listings. There just are not enough buyers to keep all these people working anything near full time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *